Just me and English

[Alan]

Hi,

It's rather a lot to wade through, I'm afraid but I have put a question at the end, if you ever get there!

Just me and English
http://www.english-test.net/stories/48/index.html

Alan
_________________
English as a Second Language
You can read my ESL story French or English?

[FangFang]

Hi, Alan:
Thanks for your questions.
As an english learner i won't choose to curl up on a sofa or study all in a book by myself. Because i think the most important thing for me is to use english. Without teachers i couldn't make progress. Even it is i still have much difficulty, some friends say "You have to admit this problem, even those experts who have been very good at english may have the similar difficulty. You have to develop those skills in a very long time because you are non-english speakers." Well, i just want to say , you can't learn everything by books , when you are in class you just learn it partly not the all. You must to USE it . To discuss with teachers and classmates will be helpful. Specially those nice english lessons which could give students much space and time to give their questions. That would be very interesting and useful in the 45 minutes!

ps: i don't object that one to one teaching, but , anyway, discussion is the most important thing. (online teaching is included)

[sunflower]

Hi Teacher Alan,

First of all, I think English is not an easy language. It takes a lot of effort and time and practice to make it. In my view, I favour the first choice. I love learning and practicing English in the classroom seeing as I then can interact with my classmates and my teacher in a lively way and communicate with them exactly well by expressing how I feel and think about what I want to know. Therefore, I like to get involved with English in a realistic situation with people, rather than chat online or curl up on a sofa and learn it all in a book.

However, just learning in the class at all times does not make more progress for me unless one to one or online and the other are included. I believe I need to induldge in all these activities to improve my English language because I'm a non-native speaker!!

Thank you.
_________________
You will never walk alone if you walk with your heart with hope!

[Conchita]

As ever, I very much enjoyed your witty story, Alan – just what I needed to calm my anger and grief at the chaos (to put it mildly) of the world. Reading is always a therapy for me, but finding the right piece at the right moment is a rare treat (thank you for that). The same goes for music, though I rely on it more for an immediate healing and soothing effect.

Contrary to your fears, your pieces never feel interminable, since they are always packed with goodies for us to feast on.

In answer to your question, I particularly favour one-to-one or individual classes – not least because they usually are, by far, a lot more productive than group tuition or because each student needs a different approach. On the other hand, we should also grab hold of and take advantage of all the available resources and make the most of them, whether it’s books, flesh-and-blood teachers (in Spanish it’s ‘flesh-and-bone’) or sites like this one.

[Tamara]

Hi

‘The highest art is an absence of any technique(s)‘ (sorry for my poor translation).

The phase was said by the same well-know (and highly skillful) man who once wrote the epitaph:
'In memory of a once fluid man, crammed and distorted by the classical mess.'

I can only add that the worst teachers I ever had in my life were like a talking (and didactic) cookery book. They could give you a good recipe to any your questions without fail, but were unable to make for you more. Because they were 'slaves' of rules-and-methods.
And the worst mistakes I made were sticking to ‘special methods’ of learning.

I think, sometimes, if knowing 'too much rules', you can’t play good. Even to start – because you would certainly break some of them and it would break your harmonious and well-composed ‘system-of-rules’ - entirely.

I generally prefer to learn (whatever the subject is) - from alive people who are (besides their wise and competency) likable and significant for me, personally. Who are MY people, MY teachers. Even though they are not professional teachers.
And ‘the method’ is not very important when you have a good contact & a way of communication (writing online, speaking one-to-one, ‘training sparring’ with another learner in the teacher presence, or whatever) allows creating an adequate learning environment and ‘space for development’.

About ‘online’ – I think, generally, it’s one of the most safety mode for learners’ ego.
They (we ) can choose more comfortable time, mood/spirits, people, questions, situations;
the distance (and sometimes, anonymity) makes some ‘lesson-leant’ situations more soft and safety and allows to avoid ‘too much’ pressing or loading (burden?) - informational or any other.
(But this could also be a disadvantage, if a leaner prones to extra-protecting him/her-self and avoids running with full efforts.)

Taking the opportunity, I just want to say: thank you, Alan, for your alive texts. I like reading them!

Tamara
_________________
It’s impossible to learn swimming without entering the water…

[thundereye]

Hello Alan,

I read your story titled "Just me and English" and it is just brilliant. Very funny and so well written! One word I tried to look up in my dictionaries but to no avail: pukker. Could you please tell me its origin?

Thank you very much!

[Alan]

Hi,

Glad you enjoyed the piece. I have a confession to make. This must be a misprint. It should read: 'pukka'. The word comes originally from India and English has taken it on with the meaning; excellent/very correct/ suggesting a description of what is as it should be.

Hope this clarifies.

Alan
_________________
English as a Foreign Language
You can read my EFL story Head expressions for you

[stew.t.]

Hi Alan

Many musings as ever.

Personally like Conchita I prefer one-to-one lessons for my German learning.

However I think with the right group (one that communicates and is proactive, class mate supportive in their learning) learning can be very productive. As language is after all about communication. Even though these groups are rare. At present only have one that can stake a claim to this title.

What do the forum users think about group dynamic, should trainers be trained on it and should students be made aware of it?

Is it fair for a fee paying client to ask them to make sacrifices for the group dynamic?

Also are groups or one-on-one lessons harder for the trainer/teacher and the student/client? Should renumeration for the trainer be adjusted accordingly?

My own language learning comes mainly from "trial and error". I am a great believer in learning from your mistakes. However this requires awareness of them in the first place and a support/ monitoring system, as well as constructively critical friends.
_________________
Please meet Stewart Tunncilff