|
|
#2 (permalink) Thu Aug 03, 2006 14:51 pm Which etc |
|
|
Hi Van Khanh,
Please have a look at some material I've written for the site on relative pronouns - particularly on the difference between defining and non-defining relatives.
ESL Lesson: Relative Pronoun http://www.english-test.net/lessons/21/index.html ESL Lesson: Relative Pronoun (2) http://www.english-test.net/lessons/22/index.html ESL Lesson: Relative Pronoun (3) http://www.english-test.net/lessons/23/index.html
When you leave out/omit the comma before 'which/who' you are defining/describing the previous noun(s). When you put in/insert the comma before 'which/who' you are not defining/describing the previous noun(s), you are adding extra information.
Alan _________________ English as a Second Language You can read my ESL story Present Simple |
|
Alan Co-founder

Joined: 27 Sep 2003 Posts: 13891 Location: UK
|
|
#3 (permalink) Thu Aug 03, 2006 15:18 pm Realative clause to Amy (and everybody) |
|
|
Hi Khahn
I personally don't like the sentence very much without a comma. But with the comma, it means "all of my houses". You're right about that.
If you want to indicate that only some of your houses were destroyed, I'd prefer using that instead of which.
- BUT -
You could possibly solve (avoid) the whole clause problem this way:
I saw my storm-ravaged houses. :D :D
OR maybe this way:
Select either all or some: I saw all/some of my storm-ravaged houses. :D
OR maybe this way:
Select either all or some: I saw my houses, all/some of which had been destroyed by the storm. :D
Amy _________________ "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power." ~ Abraham Lincoln |
|
Yankee I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 16 Apr 2006 Posts: 8316 Location: USA
|
 |
#4 (permalink) Thu Aug 03, 2006 16:08 pm Realative clause to Amy (and everybody) |
|
|
Ok,
That's clear, thanks.
Khanh |
|
Van Khanh I'm here quite often ;-)
Joined: 24 Jul 2006 Posts: 324 Location: Ho Chi Minh-City, Viet Nam
|
 |
|
| Diffrence between Chemical and 'chemical substance' | "able" versus "capable" |