Google
English-Test.net
Find penpals and make new friends today!
 
important; consequential; meaningful; having meaning; of a considerable amount
inclusive
present
quality
significant
full quiz correct answer
 
Username
Password
 Remember me? 
Search   Album   FAQ   Memberlist   Profile   Private messages   Register   Log in 

Ing-forms (labelling)



 
ESL/EFL Worksheets and Handouts for Students Printable, photocopiable, clearly structured
Designed for teachers and individual learners
For use in a classroom, at home, on your PC
ESL Forum | English Vocabulary, Grammar and Idioms
Quote: Zeal and sincerity can carry a new religion further | -Ing: The subject of 'labelling' is 'he' or 'factory'?
listening exercisestell a friend
Message
Author
Ing-forms (labelling) #1 (permalink) Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:10 pm   Ing-forms (labelling)
 

Dear teachers,

1/Please read:

He was sent to work in a factory labelling bottle for 6$ a week.

The subject of "labelling" is "he" or "factory"?
If I don't want to use "labelling", how to rewrite the sentence?

(He was sent to work in a factory where he labelled bottle for 6 $ a week.)

2/Please read:
It will mean 500 people losing their job.

The subject of "losing" is "people"?
If I don't want to use "losing", how to rewrite the sentence?

(It will mean 500 people who will lose their job. )

3/ It being very dark, we went to the bed. (a)
It is very dark, we went to the bed. (b)

(a) is correct? What is the difference btw (a) and (b)?

Best regards
Quoc
Tung Quoc
I'm here quite often ;-)


Joined: 13 Aug 2006
Posts: 372

Ing-forms (labelling) #2 (permalink) Tue Aug 15, 2006 15:26 pm   Ing-forms (labelling)
 

.
1--He was sent to work in a factory labelling bottles for $6 a week. 'Labelling...week' is a nonfinite clause used as a sentence adverbial.

He was sent to work in a factory where he labelled / where they labelled bottles for $6 a week.
'

2-- It will mean 500 people losing their jobs.

500 people losing their jobs is a nonfinite clause serving as a direct object of the verb mean (or perhaps a complement if mean is a linking verb here). Losing their jobs modifies people.

It will mean 500 people will lose their jobs.

3-- It being very dark, we went to bed. -- Correct
It was very dark, we went to bed. -- this is a comma-splice sentence, so is incorrect. It requires a semicolon instead of the comma, or rephrasing: Since it was very dark, we went to bed. The meanings are the same.
.
_________________
Native English teacher at Mister Micawber's
Mister Micawber
Language Coach


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 13015

Learn some cool expressions in the following cool storyEnglish grammar exercises — improve your English knowledge and vocabulary skillsAre you a native speaker of English? Then you should read this!How many different ways with words do you know? Subscribe to free email English course
Ing-forms (labelling) #3 (permalink) Tue Aug 15, 2006 17:55 pm   Ing-forms (labelling)
 

Dear sir,

1/ In short:

It was very dark, we went to bed. correct
It was very dark; we went to bed. incorrect

Is it right?

2/Can I write as in follows?
It being very dark; we went to bed.

3/In your opinion, when a noun/adverbial/relative clause is at the beginning of a sentence, a comma or a semicolon is correct?Or not punctuation?

Ex:Please only list the correct:
a. Before/Because/whether... +S+V +..., S+V +....
b. Before/Because/Whether... +S+V +...; S+V +....
c. Before/Because/Whether... +S+V +... S+V +.... (not punctuation)

Thanks
Tung Quoc
Tung Quoc
I'm here quite often ;-)


Joined: 13 Aug 2006
Posts: 372

Ing-forms (labelling) #4 (permalink) Tue Aug 15, 2006 23:29 pm   Ing-forms (labelling)
 

.
1-- No; you have the rule reversed. Independent clauses without a conjunction between them cannot be separated by a comma; a semicolon must be used.

It was very dark, we went to bed. incorrect
It was very dark; we went to bed. correct

2-- No. Semicolons must separate independent clauses; your first clause is nonfinite.

It being very dark, we went to bed. -- correct

3-- Normally, it is followed by a comma.

a. Before/Because/whether... +S+V +..., S+V +.... -- correct.
.
_________________
Native English teacher at Mister Micawber's
Mister Micawber
Language Coach


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 13015

Display posts from previous:   
Quote: Zeal and sincerity can carry a new religion further | -Ing: The subject of 'labelling' is 'he' or 'factory'?
ESL Forum | English Vocabulary, Grammar and Idioms All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1
Latest topics on English Forums
Meaning of UnforceableMeaning of "little by way of"Gerund or infinitive?Phrase: Although we may pride ourselves a great dealWhat were his meticulous/exact/accurate/correct words?Careful + of/about/with/onCould she be more out of my league?BC 1000 or 1000 bc or bc 1000 or 1000 b.c. or b.c. 1000Problem versus Matter's :: Two 9's or Two 9sGo to bed versus Go to sleepSome or One (Let's buy some/ones with flowers on)Quote: Hope is a good breakfast, but it is a bad supper

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Subscribe to FREE email English course
First name E-mail