|
|
 #2 (permalink) Thu Aug 24, 2006 5:41 am 'But, no matter' Versus 'But, doesn't matter' |
|
|
.
I have repaired your punctuation and supplied a necessary pronoun. They are now essentially synonymous:
1- I have nothing to eat, but it/that doesn't matter!
2- I have nothing to eat, but no matter!
.
_________________
Native English teacher at Mister Micawber's |
|
 Mister Micawber
Language Coach
Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 13015
|
|
| #3 (permalink) Thu Aug 24, 2006 18:55 pm 'But, no matter' Versus 'But, doesn't matter' |
|
|
| Why did you place commas after but, Tom? I wonder. :D |
|
Pamela
I'm a Communicator ;-)
Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 1271
Location: RF
|
 |
| #4 (permalink) Thu Aug 24, 2006 20:49 pm 'But, no matter' Versus 'But, doesn't matter' |
|
|
| Mister Micawber wrote: |
I have repaired your punctuation and supplied a necessary pronoun. They are now essentially synonymous:
1- I have nothing to eat, but it/that doesn't matter!
2- I have nothing to eat, but no matter!
. |
I liked the collocation essentially synonymous! :D
I would like to ask another question:
When in ( it is) no matter, the it part can be optional, why not in (it) doesn't matter?
Tom |
|
Tom
I'm a Communicator ;-)
Joined: 30 May 2006
Posts: 2103
|
|
| #5 (permalink) Fri Aug 25, 2006 0:46 am 'But, no matter' Versus 'But, doesn't matter' |
|
|
.
| Quote: |
| When in (it is) no matter, the it part can be optional, why not in (it) doesn't matter? |
I don't see that it is optional; only it is as a unit is optional.
However, without delving too deeply, I presume that it is because matter is a noun in complement in the first form while in the second form, matter is the verb. No matter is acceptable as elision; not matter is not.
.
_________________
Native English teacher at Mister Micawber's |
|
Mister Micawber
Language Coach
Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 13015
|
|
|
| If you are wanting ...? | "parent are" OR "parents is" |
