|
|
#2 (permalink) Wed Sep 27, 2006 8:43 am "used to" + infinitive |
|
|
Hi Tamara,
I'd love to help but I don't quite follow what you want to know. Could you have another shot, please.
Alan _________________ English as a Second Language You can read my ESL story 'the' vs. 'a/an' |
|
Alan Co-founder

Joined: 27 Sep 2003 Posts: 9114 Location: UK
|
|
#3 (permalink) Wed Sep 27, 2006 9:04 am Used to + infinitive: Which verbs can NOT be used in? |
|
|
Hi Alan
 This week I started my grammar classes, but the next is on Thursday. 
Well... You don’t use 'I am liking' – as like is 'not-action' verb (or how you name that?…) seem, consist, understand, hate, etc…. There is a rule for that.
Something like that... I would just like to know, is there (a group of) verbs that don’t make sense in the pattern used+infinitive. I have a vague suspicious that they (such verbs) are, but have no evidence. 
Sometimes I'm in need to express something (that makes sense in my first language) with the pattern used-infinitive and some verbs, but… fear
For example, used to seem – does this make sense to you?
Briefly speaking: I would be happy to know that there is no 'limitation'.  _________________ It’s impossible to learn swimming without entering the water… |
|
Tamara I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 25 May 2006 Posts: 1577 Location: UK
|
 |
#4 (permalink) Wed Sep 27, 2006 9:24 am Used to |
|
|
Hi Tamara,
Thanks for your further explanation. Used to + infinitive in the sense of did at one time but not now would appear to be all right with most verbs. Off the top of my head I can't see there would be a restriction on the type of verb. Your example: used to seem could be used as follows:
She used to seem as if she wasn't interested in anything but now she appears to be fascinated by everything.
Alan _________________ English as a Foreign Language You can read my EFL story Don't bank on it |
|
Alan Co-founder

Joined: 27 Sep 2003 Posts: 9114 Location: UK
|
 |
#5 (permalink) Wed Sep 27, 2006 14:50 pm Used to |
|
|
Aha! No restriction – that’s great! Thanks a lot, Alan. 
Now I’ve recalled: my last trouble was with he (a researcher) used to discover (side effects of... bla-bla-bla...) (i.e. when a verb refers to some 'not-reversable' activities in the past).
OK. _________________ It’s impossible to learn swimming without entering the water… |
|
Tamara I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 25 May 2006 Posts: 1577 Location: UK
|
 |
|
Yankee I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 16 Apr 2006 Posts: 8265 Location: USA
|
 |
#7 (permalink) Wed Sep 27, 2006 19:11 pm Expressions with 'used to' + infinitive |
|
|
Hi,
Of course you could say: babies used to die in early infancy in the 19th century/come into the world/be born prematurely in some situations/men used to bite the dust in their hundreds in Ireland/the oldest sons used to buy the farm when they had saved up enough.
Or am I being perverse?
Alan _________________ English as a Second Language You can read my ESL story Progressive Forms |
|
Alan Co-founder

Joined: 27 Sep 2003 Posts: 9114 Location: UK
|
 |
#8 (permalink) Wed Sep 27, 2006 21:38 pm ...used to know English :) |
|
|
Thank you! _________________ It’s impossible to learn swimming without entering the water… |
|
Tamara I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 25 May 2006 Posts: 1577 Location: UK
|
 |
|
Yankee I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 16 Apr 2006 Posts: 8265 Location: USA
|
 |
|
Conchita Language Coach

Joined: 26 Dec 2005 Posts: 2826 Location: Madrid, Spain
|
 |
#11 (permalink) Sun Oct 01, 2006 9:05 am Acute condition :) |
|
|
Hi
Good Sunday morning, isn’t is? 
| Quote: | | "My first car used to die regularly." |
This is it… My chronic ailment, I mean… (No, no... not dying but just using 'used to' )
To me, used + to + verb requires two things on the timescale - to be used correctly: (1) the same object (let it be general, like 'people' from the Alan's example...) and (2) action, the verb refers to, that switches to opposite (or just stopped).
Used to smoke, but now has given up. Died regularly, OK – and now has just stopped doing that. 
| Alan wrote: | | Used to + infinitive in the sense of did at one time but not now |
Well, I’ll try to explain my (made-up?) trouble with the Amy's example.
Amy’s first car did die regularly (in the past). OK. Not now. But... NOT because this car got improved , but rather because - it’s not Amy’s car any more – even though it remains being the first forever or - it died once and for all – and now not a car any more, at all or - Amy is still an owner, but she doesn’t drive the car any more (and has it just for sentimental memory ). The car is in (one of ) her garages, immovable 
So, to my view, now the Amy’s first car is just unable to die regularly - the chain with (1)-(2) things on the timescale has broken… and I cannot admit the sentence  The Past Simple or Past Perfect…
That’s my usual trouble with 'used to'. Anybody, untangle me, please.  _________________ It’s impossible to learn swimming without entering the water… |
|
Tamara I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 25 May 2006 Posts: 1577 Location: UK
|
 |
|
Yankee I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 16 Apr 2006 Posts: 8265 Location: USA
|
 |
#13 (permalink) Sun Oct 01, 2006 9:21 am Used to + infinitive: Which verbs can NOT be used in? |
|
|
Yes, Amy, that's it.
Now there is no such an object at all - to speak about it in now... It does not exist and cannot act at all. _________________ It’s impossible to learn swimming without entering the water… |
|
Tamara I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 25 May 2006 Posts: 1577 Location: UK
|
 |
#14 (permalink) Sun Oct 01, 2006 9:42 am Used to |
|
|
Hi Tamara,
Let's get away from morbidity! The car used to work but now it doesn't work - but the car can still exist even if it mopes in the garage. Am I making sense?
Alan _________________ English as a Foreign Language You can read my EFL story Are you a Persuader? |
|
Alan Co-founder

Joined: 27 Sep 2003 Posts: 9114 Location: UK
|
 |
|
| That’s settled it | See and meet |