|
|
#2 (permalink) Sun Oct 01, 2006 15:23 pm Used to |
|
|
. Used to and would can be used to talk about something you did repeatedly or habitually in the past (but no longer do now).
dictionary definitions for would _________________ "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power." ~ Abraham Lincoln |
|
Yankee I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 16 Apr 2006 Posts: 8316 Location: USA
|
|
#3 (permalink) Sun Oct 01, 2006 15:27 pm Used to |
|
|
Hi,
I used to like playing football. = I would like playing football. I used to live in Singapour. =I would live in Singapour. There used to be a house there.=There would be a house there. I used to go there every Sunday.=I would go there every Sunday.
Right or wrong? If wrong,why?
Alandro |
|
Alandro255 I'm new here and I like it ;-)
Joined: 14 Sep 2006 Posts: 45
|
 |
#4 (permalink) Sun Oct 01, 2006 16:41 pm Used to |
|
|
. Used to can be used for repeated/habitual actions AND states. Would can only be used to talk about repeated/habitual actions in the past.
play = action: - I used to play football every Saturday when I was young. = I would play football every Saturday when I was young.
like = state: - I used to like playing football.
live = state (i.e., "live" is not a series of individual repeated activites): - I used to live in Singapore.
be = state: - There used to be a house there.
go = action: - I used to go there every Sunday.= I would go there every Sunday. _________________ "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power." ~ Abraham Lincoln |
|
Yankee I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 16 Apr 2006 Posts: 8316 Location: USA
|
 |
#5 (permalink) Sun Oct 01, 2006 17:59 pm Would |
|
|
Hi,
It's worth noting that would in the sense of a repeated action in the past is really only used in the written form.
Alan
You say you live in Italy. Which Italian grammars on English have you used? _________________ English as a Second Language You can read my ESL story Present Simple |
|
Alan Co-founder

Joined: 27 Sep 2003 Posts: 13890 Location: UK
|
 |
#6 (permalink) Mon Oct 02, 2006 6:35 am Would |
|
|
I have only:
Oxford-Paravia English Italian Dictionary, OUP, 2001. Italian Grammar in Practice, 2002.
Alandro |
|
Alandro255 I'm new here and I like it ;-)
Joined: 14 Sep 2006 Posts: 45
|
 |
#7 (permalink) Tue May 01, 2007 21:05 pm used to/would |
|
|
they are interchangable in many places. but when it is stative verb, would cannot give the exact meaning "used to" give. that means in your first three examples used to and would are not interchangable.
many greetings. |
|
Aardvark New Member
Joined: 01 May 2007 Posts: 1
|
 |
#8 (permalink) Tue Oct 25, 2011 6:06 am Used to!= would (interchangeable / not interchangeable) |
|
|
Hi Alan,
Your example makes sense but could you please give me several other examples about this? Because i've not been clear in distinguishing the difference between "used to" and "would".
Thanks, H |
|
Hoang4 New Member
Joined: 14 Jun 2010 Posts: 2
|
 |
#9 (permalink) Tue Oct 25, 2011 8:32 am Used to!= would (interchangeable / not interchangeable) |
|
|
Hi,
I can only repeat that 'would' suggesting that something happened on a regular basis is usually used in a literary setting. If you want to say something about what you did, you say: I used to work as a journalist but now I work as a teacher. If you are describing something, you write: When we were young, we would wake up early, forget breakfast and go for a swim.
Alan _________________ English as a Foreign Language You can read my EFL story Progressive Forms |
|
Alan Co-founder

Joined: 27 Sep 2003 Posts: 13890 Location: UK
|
 |
#10 (permalink) Tue Oct 25, 2011 17:33 pm Used to!= would (interchangeable / not interchangeable) |
|
|
| Thanks Alan! I have more a little bit clear (am i right with this sentence?) |
|
Hoang4 New Member
Joined: 14 Jun 2010 Posts: 2
|
 |
|
| the case | now that |