|
|
Sat Oct 14, 2006 6:03 am Twice as expensive as. vs. Twice more expensive as |
|
|
| The first sentence is good, the second is not. |
|
canadian45 I'm here quite often ;-)
Joined: 08 Oct 2006 Posts: 184 Location: canada
|
|
Sat Oct 14, 2006 9:21 am Twice as expensive as. vs. Twice more expensive as |
|
|
Hi Jupiter
You could possibly say "twice more" to mean "two additional times". For example: He rang the bell twice more. But, generally speaking, I'd say "twice more than" would not be used by native speakers. It sounds odd to me.
Amy _________________ Amy
.
ESL teacher, translator, and a native speaker of American English |
|
Yankee I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 16 Apr 2006 Posts: 7443 Location: Northeast US
|
 |
Sat Oct 14, 2006 20:47 pm Twice as expensive as. vs. Twice more expensive as |
|
|
| Following on what Yankee has imlpied, one of the reasons 'twice more expensive than' is not good English is that 'twice more expensive than' could logically be interpreted to mean 'three times as expensive as'. |
|
canadian45 I'm here quite often ;-)
Joined: 08 Oct 2006 Posts: 184 Location: canada
|
 |
Sat Oct 14, 2006 21:54 pm Twice as expensive as. vs. Twice more expensive as |
|
|
| Amy wrote: | | He rang the bell twice more. |
Did he ring the bell three times altogether?
Tom |
|
Tom I'm a Communicator ;-)
Joined: 30 May 2006 Posts: 1976
|
 |
Sat Oct 14, 2006 22:34 pm Twice as expensive as. vs. Twice more expensive as |
|
|
Hi Tom
It's not possible to know from my sentence how many times he rang the bell.
If he'd already rung the bell 5 times and then decided to ring twice more, it would end up being a total of 7 times, for example.
Amy _________________ Amy
.
ESL teacher, translator, and a native speaker of American English |
|
Yankee I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 16 Apr 2006 Posts: 7443 Location: Northeast US
|
 |
|
| Talk at sb/blow away one's cobwebs (American English) | Adjective which cannot be used in comparison |