Google
English-Test.net
Find penpals and make new friends today!
 
failure; fiasco; sputtering which gradually fades into silence
proposition
fizzle
swift
posture
full quiz correct answer
Dictionaries   TOEIC   TOEFL   GMAT   SAT   GRE   MCAT   PCAT   ASVAB   Interviews
Tests   Grammar   Articles   Stories   Shop   Services   English for winners   Speaking
Home   Top 100   Start your FREE email English course now!   Audio Lessons   Jobs
 
Username
Password
 Remember me? 
Search   Album   FAQ   Memberlist   Profile   Private messages   Register   Log in 

Lose to a fire?



 
ESL/EFL Worksheets and Handouts for Students Printable, photocopiable, clearly structured
Designed for teachers and individual learners
For use in a classroom, at home, on your PC
ESL Forums | English Vocabulary, Grammar and Idioms
Comma question: charge down the street(, )towards the bridge | Article preceeding town names
listening exercises • tell a friend
Message
 Author
Lose to a fire? #1 (permalink) Tue Oct 17, 2006 23:10 pm   Lose to a fire?		  
"Dreiser was born in 1871 into a large family whose fortunes had in the recent past taken a dramatic turn for the worse. Before Theodore's birth, his father had built up a successful factory business only to lose it to a fire".

Well said!

In what instances can we use this "lose to"?

In the above passage I believe narrator purposly used "lost to a fire" instead of a weaker one "was lost in a fire".

I have recently read an article about the methods of irrigation:"Sprinkler systems are a more efficient type of surface irrigation, but they also lose water to evaporation".

Somehow, I would not use "lose water to evaporation in this sentence". For me it does not seem right.

Can we say e.g." His fortune was lost to a gambling"?

What is the difference between" Lost in a fire and lost to a fire.

Please, please provide as many examples as possible.

Thank you so much.
Toefl
I'm new here and I like it ;-)


Joined: 19 Jan 2006
Posts: 41
Location: Toronto
Lose to a fire? #2 (permalink) Wed Oct 18, 2006 6:44 am   Lose to a fire?		  
1...'lost to a fire' and 'lost in a fire' can mean exactly the same thing, which is that something was 'destroyed by' or 'destroyed in' a fire. 'lost to' is not weaker or stronger than 'lost in'.
'lost in a fire' can have a meaning different than 'destroyed in a fire'; it can mean that there is a fire around you and you don't know where you and you don't know how to get out.

2...There is no problem with 'lose water to evaporation'; it is good English.

3...'His fortune was lost to a gambling' is bad English. You can say:
a) ''His fortune was 'lost to' or 'lost in' a gambling casino.'' or "He lost his fortune 'in' or 'to' a gambling casino."
b) "His fortune was lost to gamblers." or "He lost his fortune to gamblers."
c) "His fortune was lost by gambling." or "He lost his fortune by gambling."
d) Some people might say "His fortune was lost to gambling.'' or "He lost his fortune to gambling." but I don't like that very much. I prefer 'by gambling'.
Canadian45
I'm here quite often ;-)


Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 184
Location: Canada
Learn to use the present simple with the help of this short storyEnglish grammar exercises — improve your English knowledge and vocabulary skillsAre you a native speaker of English? Then you should read this!Here is all you want to know about English! Click to subscribe to free email English course
To #3 (permalink) Wed Oct 18, 2006 8:59 am   To		  
Hi,

The preposition 'to' in your examples gives the idea of as a result of or owing to.

Alan
_________________
English as a Second Language
You can read my ESL story Present Simple
Alan
Co-founder
Alan Townend

Joined: 27 Sep 2003
Posts: 13891
Location: UK
To #4 (permalink) Wed Oct 18, 2006 23:07 pm   To		  
Alan wrote:
Hi,

The preposition 'to' in your examples gives the idea of as a result of or owing to.

Alan


Hi Alan,

Do you think the author of the above text purposly used "lost to" instead of "lost in" to tell us what happened with the business? Do you think that it would have been weaker if he had used "lost in a fire" as opposed to "lost to a fire" in this context?

Could you please think of other examples.

Thank you
Toefl
I'm new here and I like it ;-)


Joined: 19 Jan 2006
Posts: 41
Location: Toronto
To #5 (permalink) Thu Oct 19, 2006 8:46 am   To		  
Hi,

'To' in this sense simply explains the result and not the circumstances.

Alan
_________________
English as a Foreign Language
You can read my EFL story Progressive Forms
Alan
Co-founder
Alan Townend

Joined: 27 Sep 2003
Posts: 13891
Location: UK
Display posts from previous:   
Comma question: charge down the street(, )towards the bridge | Article preceeding town names
ESL Forums | English Vocabulary, Grammar and Idioms All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1
Latest topics on ESL EFL Forums

Start FREE email English course now!
Join more than 100,000 learners!
Everything, but VERSUS everything else than • Word order: President Vladimir Putin of Russia • Where vs. in which • What is the intension of phrasal verbs? • In the future, games won't only be on "the" TV... • Some questions about error identification • In hoping vs In the hope • Use Too and Either • Objective pronoun • Nouns - Place or Thing • Strike, struck, struck/stricken • This will help you + [to-infinitive or bare infinitive]? • What and How

 
 You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Provided by phpBB ©2001-2012 phpBB Group
Subscribe to FREE email English course
First name E-mail