|
|
#2 (permalink) Sat Oct 28, 2006 10:10 am To be a doctor versus to be doctor |
|
|
Hi,
Have a look at some material I've written for the site:
Articles in English: The vs. A/an http://www.english-test.net/lessons/16/index.html
A _________________ English as a Second Language You can read my ESL story Present Simple |
|
Alan Co-founder

Joined: 27 Sep 2003 Posts: 13891 Location: UK
|
|
#3 (permalink) Mon Oct 30, 2006 7:15 am To be a doctor versus to be doctor |
|
|
thanks a lot Alan
I was need to your explain (the articles) :D I'm reading it and studying now.
Mba _________________ Right is always stronger than iniquity. |
|
Dark Magician I'm here quite often ;-)
Joined: 21 May 2006 Posts: 490 Location: Middle east
|
 |
#4 (permalink) Wed Mar 25, 2009 13:52 pm To be a doctor versus to be doctor |
|
|
Hi Alan! I read your article about articles and have some questions, but don't know where to ask them. May be here? You write: "A horse is a noble animal" - this represents no particular person or thing, but "The donkey is a very obstinate animal" - represents a class of objects. Sorry, I don't understand what's the difference! And further: abstract nouns do not attract indefinite articles. But why Charlie hoped "that the terror could not be seen in his eyes"? I suspect I've made some goofs, sorry, I'm going to learn by my mistakes :) |
|
Vermilion I'm new here and I like it ;-)

Joined: 24 Mar 2009 Posts: 17 Location: Russia
|
 |
#5 (permalink) Wed Mar 25, 2009 14:08 pm To be a doctor versus to be doctor |
|
|
Hi Vermilion,
Don't worry about making what you call 'goofs'. That doesn't matter at all! The difference between 'a' and 'the' with reference to 'donkey' and 'horse' is that 'A horse is a noble animal' is just a general statement whereas 'The donkey is a very obstinate animal' picks out the donkey as a particular example of an obstinate animal. I agree the difference is slight but the reason why we choose 'the' is because we want to particularise and the reason why we choose 'a' is to generalise.
On your second point - usually abstract nouns do not have articles attached but in this particular sentence: that the terror could not be seen in his eyes we are again particularising 'terror'. It isn't just 'terror' it is the terror you can't see in his eyes.
Hope this helps a little.
Alan _________________ English as a Foreign Language You can read my EFL story Progressive Forms |
|
Alan Co-founder

Joined: 27 Sep 2003 Posts: 13891 Location: UK
|
 |
#6 (permalink) Thu Mar 26, 2009 6:52 am To be a doctor versus to be doctor |
|
|
Thank you Alan! I think I understood these examples. But don't know if I can see the difference in some other situation and choose right articles in that struggle "generalization vs. particularising"… Nuances are the most difficult matter in foreign language! |
|
Vermilion I'm new here and I like it ;-)

Joined: 24 Mar 2009 Posts: 17 Location: Russia
|
 |
#7 (permalink) Sun Aug 01, 2010 6:42 am To be a doctor versus to be doctor |
|
|
She always said that when she "grew up she wanted" to be a doctor.
Grow up is future event, why are we using past tense for this sentence? |
|
Sheemin New Member
Joined: 27 Jun 2010 Posts: 2
|
 |
#8 (permalink) Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:13 am To be a doctor versus to be doctor |
|
|
Hi,
It is a future event in reality but you have quoted an example of indirect speech speech where the tenses that follow 'she said' change into a past form also.
You might like to look at this: http://www.english-test.net/lessons/6/index.html
Alan _________________ English as a Second Language You can read my ESL story Passive Voice |
|
Alan Co-founder

Joined: 27 Sep 2003 Posts: 13891 Location: UK
|
 |
#9 (permalink) Thu Mar 31, 2011 16:03 pm answer me |
|
|
| why in this test we say a doctor not doctor or the doctor |
|
Shahzad7 New Member
Joined: 31 Mar 2011 Posts: 3
|
 |
|
| prolific reproduction. | What is the difference between "make" and "do"? |