|
|
Sat Nov 25, 2006 5:33 am Function of Present Participle |
|
|
| Both phrases explain the situations that lead to, or make neccessary the main clause. That is to say, they providde explanatory information,... I am not a grammarian, but I would guess that the properly terminology for such sentence parts is 'non-restrictive clauses'.... Any others have thoughts on this? |
|
Pond969 You can meet me at english-test.net
Joined: 17 Nov 2006 Posts: 99 Location: Canada
|
|
Sat Nov 25, 2006 9:57 am Function of Present Participle |
|
|
Hi Jupiter
Those are participial clauses. Your sentences could be rewritten this way:
Because/When he found the front door locked, he went round to the back.
Because I didn't know his phone number, I wasn't able to ring him.
There is a write-up about participial clauses here that might be interesting for you.
Amy _________________ Amy
.
ESL teacher, translator, and a native speaker of American English |
|
Yankee I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 16 Apr 2006 Posts: 7781 Location: USA
|
 |
Sat Nov 25, 2006 10:59 am Participles |
|
|
Hi Jupiter,
The participle phrases that you have highlighted in your sentences are what are nowadays called nonfinite clauses because they do not have a subject but borrow it from an adjacent clause. In your sentences:
Finding the front door locked, He went round the back.
Not knowing his phone number, I wasn't able to ring him.
you can see in the first one 'he' is borrowed and in the second one 'I' is borrowed. The danger in this kind of construction is not to have a different subject for each one. This results in confusion.
A _________________ English as a Second Language You can read my ESL story Start or begin? |
|
Alan Co-founder

Joined: 27 Sep 2003 Posts: 7363 Location: UK
|
 |
|
| Very + Adj vs So + Adj | So + Adj vs So that |