|
|
#2 (permalink) Sun Mar 04, 2007 22:07 pm An "inconvenient truth" about Al Gore |
|
|
Hi Jamie,
Given the fact that the Gore household could be called anything but an average American household, I think that they are using very little energy on their property. As for the carbon offsets, this sounds like a pretty good business idea to me. It's up to the individual customer whether or not they buy the global warming story. I also think that that American companies can't be forced to buy anything. There is a free enterprise system in the US so company managers take business decisions rather than being forced by the government to buy something they don't need.
TOEIC listening, talks: Afternoon traffic report sponsored by fitness studio |
|
Torsten Learning Coach

Joined: 25 Sep 2003 Posts: 14503 Location: EU
|
|
#3 (permalink) Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:03 am An "inconvenient truth" about Al Gore |
|
|
Bush's house in Texas is actually much more energy efficient than any of Gore's houses, but he's still painted up as the devil.
You're right that selling the carbon offets is a good business idea, but it shows that Gore has a clear conflict of interest in peddling the global warming scenario. Part of his intention is actually to get the US congress to pass laws making such offsets necessary, and he would then be positioned to profit from trading in them. As you know, we don't have complete laissez faire free enterprise here, and our businesses our subject to quite a lot of environmental, safety and social regulations. |
|
Jamie (K) I'm a Communicator ;-)
Joined: 24 Feb 2006 Posts: 6552 Location: Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
 |
#4 (permalink) Wed Mar 07, 2007 15:50 pm An "inconvenient truth" about Al Gore |
|
|
From now on, Gore will put his electricity bills in his lock box.
"And a hypocrite shall lead them." _________________ Billie Jean is not my lover. Hee. |
|
Prezbucky I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 2621 Location: Nashville, TN (USA)
|
 |
|
| Google translate | Rant forums |