|
|
#2 (permalink) Tue Jun 26, 2007 15:20 pm 'If I would have met' vs 'If I had met' |
|
|
Hi Thito
This sentence would be grammatically correct:
If I had met them, I would have spoken to them. _________________ "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power." ~ Abraham Lincoln |
|
Yankee I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 16 Apr 2006 Posts: 8316 Location: USA
|
|
#3 (permalink) Tue Jun 26, 2007 15:29 pm 'If I would have met' vs 'If I had met' |
|
|
The second, Thito. If I had met them I would have spoken to them.It's a mixed conditional sentence. It means that I don't meet them that's why I didn't speak to them. |
|
Pamela I'm a Communicator ;-)
Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 1271 Location: RF
|
 |
#4 (permalink) Tue Jun 26, 2007 15:46 pm 'If I would have met' vs 'If I had met' |
|
|
Hi Pamela
Actually, that's a classic type 3 conditional:
IF + had +past participle , would + have + past participle
The reality in the past was this: I didn't talk to them because I didn't meet (see) them. . _________________ "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power." ~ Abraham Lincoln |
|
Yankee I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 16 Apr 2006 Posts: 8316 Location: USA
|
 |
#5 (permalink) Tue Jun 26, 2007 15:59 pm 'If I would have met' vs 'If I had met' |
|
|
| Because it is an unreal conditional (as yankee said) the "if clause" doesn't carry would. Would goes in the main clause. The past tense in this case implies the unreal situation. |
|
Nnkk New Member
Joined: 25 Jun 2007 Posts: 6
|
 |
#6 (permalink) Tue Jun 26, 2007 17:48 pm 'If I would have met' vs 'If I had met' |
|
|
| Yankee wrote: |
Hi Pamela
Actually, that's a classic type 3 conditional:
IF + had +past participle , would + have + past participle
The reality in the past was this: I didn't talk to them because I didn't meet (see) them. . |
Amy, thanks. Actually I was automatically thinking of If I met them, I would have spoken to them when I posted. :oops: |
|
Pamela I'm a Communicator ;-)
Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 1271 Location: RF
|
 |
#7 (permalink) Tue Jun 26, 2007 18:58 pm 'If I would have met' vs 'If I had met' |
|
|
Hi Pamela
I suspected that you might have misread the sentence because I know that you know conditionals.
By the way, you might be interested to know that the poster's first sentence (with 'them' added to it) would actually be a fairly typical native speaker error (in AmE). _________________ "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power." ~ Abraham Lincoln |
|
Yankee I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 16 Apr 2006 Posts: 8316 Location: USA
|
 |
#8 (permalink) Tue Jun 26, 2007 19:15 pm 'If I would have met' vs 'If I had met' |
|
|
| Pamela wrote: |
Amy, thanks. Actually I was automatically thinking of If I met them, I would have spoken to them when I posted. :oops: |
I'm having a feeling that the sentence in italic is a bit inconsistent. IMHO, it should read If I had met them, I would have spoken to them |
|
Lost_Soul I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 15 Sep 2006 Posts: 1861 Location: South Park, Colorado, USA
|
 |
#9 (permalink) Wed Jun 27, 2007 0:24 am 'If I would have met' vs 'If I had met' |
|
|
But the original sentence does read had met, LS. That was the point: I think Pamela was simply explaining that she misread the sentence as a mixed conditional, which would naturally be "inconsistent" with the "standard" types of if-sentences. Her original interpretation (a mixed conditional using only 'met') might be possible in just the right context. That's what makes mixed conditionals tough to explain, though. The context usually has to be described in some detail in order to justify and/or understand the mix.
For the record, I think everybody now agrees that Thito's second sentence (with the word 'them' added) is grammatically correct. :D :wink:
'If I had met them, I would have spoken to them.' _________________ "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power." ~ Abraham Lincoln |
|
Yankee I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 16 Apr 2006 Posts: 8316 Location: USA
|
 |
|
| Difference between 'I have come' and 'I came' | What's been completed? ('have been completed' vs 'is completed') |