|
|
#2 (permalink) Sun Sep 02, 2007 9:05 am Conditional he wouldn't ... If they hadn't... |
|
|
Hi,
I don't think it's really a question of grammar but more of meaning. I would choose 'wouldn't be' because of the adverb 'now'. If you omit 'now', I would choose 'wouldn't have been.'
Alan _________________ English as a Second Language You can read my ESL story Present Simple |
|
Alan Co-founder

Joined: 27 Sep 2003 Posts: 13892 Location: UK
|
|
#3 (permalink) Sun Sep 02, 2007 15:31 pm Conditional he wouldn't ... If they hadn't... |
|
|
. Without the word 'now', it might be better to use the verb 'become' rather than 'be', and then you would have a standard type 3 conditional rather than a "mixed conditional":
He wouldn't have become an actor if they hadn't encouraged him to act.
"Mixed conditionals" are OK, but their use must be justified by the context and/or (as Alan said) the precise meaning of the sentence. . _________________ "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power." ~ Abraham Lincoln |
|
Yankee I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 16 Apr 2006 Posts: 8316 Location: USA
|
 |
|
| Can someone correct me, please! | Is that wrong? (Not only do basic cooking techniques require great skill...) |