Google
English-Test.net
Find penpals and make new friends today!
 
to make a graph; to draw; to diagram
flaw
earn
chart
invent
full quiz correct answer
 
Username
Password
 Remember me? 
Search   Album   FAQ   Memberlist   Profile   Private messages   Register   Log in 

One matter about conditional and "But For"



 
ESL/EFL Worksheets and Handouts for Students Printable, photocopiable, clearly structured
Designed for teachers and individual learners
For use in a classroom, at home, on your PC
ESL Forums | English Vocabulary, Grammar and Idioms
Shall or Will | why "it was a dream come true"?
listening exercisestell a friend
Message
Author
One matter about conditional and "But For" #1 (permalink) Fri Nov 23, 2007 23:44 pm   One matter about conditional and "But For"
 

This is the sentence to change :
But for your wisdom, we'd have never coped with our problems

should we change it into :
1) If it weren't for your wisdom, we'd have never coped with our problems
or
2) If it hadn't been for your wisdom, we'd have never coped with our problems

I think that 1st is correct because your wisdom is sth which hasn't changed while using 2) option suggest that you were wise only at that time (you dealt with our problems and that's it) and now you're not wise or whatever ? :D

I'm not sure which one is correct and sounds more naturally :/
what do you think ?
thanks in advance
mike
_________________
Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes. Oscar Wilde
Michal. I'm an english student :-)
Michauek
I'm here quite often ;-)


Joined: 29 Apr 2007
Posts: 171
Location: Poland

One matter about conditional and "But For" #2 (permalink) Sat Nov 24, 2007 4:18 am   One matter about conditional and "But For"
 

michauek wrote:
should we change it into :
1) If it weren't for your wisdom, we'd have never coped with our problems
or
2) If it hadn't been for your wisdom, we'd have never coped with our problems

That's exactly right. You should make it either...
1) If it weren't for your wisdom, we'd have never coped with our problems
or
2) If it hadn't been for your wisdom, we'd have never coped with our problems
:D

Which one to choose has more to do with how far in the past your mind imagines the person's wisdom to be. If you think of the person's wisdom as still being visibly present, you use "weren't". If you're thinking of his display of wisdom during just that particular incident in the past, you can use "hadn't been". My gut feeling is that test writers would want "hadn't been", but it really depends on how much time you imagine the person's wisdom is spanning.

However, the two "right" sentences both have something that bothers me:

Quote:
we'd have never coped with our problems

For some reason I don't know, ESL books have started to tell people to put the adverb right before the main verb. This results in some dumb-sounding, mildly ungrammatical sentences. The adverb is best put right after the position of the first auxiliary verb, if there is one. So it sounds better to say:

we'd never have coped with our problems
Jamie (K)
I'm a Communicator ;-)


Joined: 24 Feb 2006
Posts: 6552
Location: Detroit, Michigan, USA

Can you find all the prepositions in this story?English grammar exercises — improve your English knowledge and vocabulary skillsAre you a native speaker of English? Then you should read this!Have you read a good anecdote today? Subscribe to free email English course
One matter about conditional and "But For" #3 (permalink) Sat Nov 24, 2007 14:41 pm   One matter about conditional and "But For"
 

thanks a lot. It solved my problem ;)
adding comment to the 2nd part of the sentence- I thought that it's correct to put "never" after "have" but thanks for explanation !
Mike
_________________
Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes. Oscar Wilde
Michal. I'm an english student :-)
Michauek
I'm here quite often ;-)


Joined: 29 Apr 2007
Posts: 171
Location: Poland

One matter about conditional and "But For" #4 (permalink) Sat Nov 24, 2007 14:47 pm   One matter about conditional and "But For"
 

michauek wrote:
adding comment to the 2nd part of the sentence- I thought that it's correct to put "never" after "have" but thanks for explanation !

This is what books have suddenly started teaching, but it makes the sentence sound clunky.

I think they've started saying that with the idea that it's easier to tell students to put the adverb before the main verb, than it is to tell them that it goes right after the first auxiliary or "be" even if there's no auxiliary. But sometimes the easiest explanation doesn't result in the best English.
Jamie (K)
I'm a Communicator ;-)


Joined: 24 Feb 2006
Posts: 6552
Location: Detroit, Michigan, USA

Display posts from previous:   
Shall or Will | why "it was a dream come true"?
ESL Forums | English Vocabulary, Grammar and Idioms All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1
Latest topics on ESL EFL Forums
meaning of the verb "hack off""Please attend to the machine." vs "Please see to the machine.'Expression: "She is not being understanding."the meaning of "walves"meaning of "shed some light on something"meaning of "in the grind"what does 'running for their lives' mean?hot English tipsmeaning of the phrase "make a show of something"meaning of "barely had the presence of mind"I had to have me the walkin' bluesExpression: "Your duty as husband demands that you..."Expression: "First time I heard death rattle."

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Subscribe to FREE email English course
First name E-mail