|
|
#2 (permalink) Tue Dec 25, 2007 13:26 pm Meaning of the phrase "a way in a jungle" |
|
|
Hi, Vovka ! (I guess it's OK :) ) I disagree with you. In that sentence we need to express the idea of the continuity of the "talk" action. Whenever I called in on Sam, he was talking on the phone. Compare it with these (fundamental facts, something which remains the same): Since when do frogs talk Women talk all the time
Marry Christmas to you too, ! |
|
Lost_Soul I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 15 Sep 2006 Posts: 1861 Location: South Park, Colorado, USA
|
|
#3 (permalink) Tue Dec 25, 2007 13:49 pm ...a way in a jungle. |
|
|
| vladimir wrote: |
Hello,
I like doing grammar exercises.It's like to find a way in a jungle.There is a self-study reference and practice book by M.Hewings.In unit 6 on the left-hand page it's said 'we use the past simple rather than the past continuous when we are talking about repeated actions or events in the past' and an example is given: She slept very badly whenever she stayed with her grandparents.
On the right-hand side there are exercises to do.Doing the ex N 6.4 I've made a mistake: Whenever I call in on Sam,he talked on the phone.('was talking' is the correct answer according to the key).
In my opinion 'whenever' indicates repeated actions in the past in both sentences.
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year. vladimir. |
Hi Vladimir
There is a difference between the two sentences you gave. In the sentence "Whenever I called in on Sam, he was talking on the phone" there is a short past action (called) that interrupts a different, already on-going action (was talking).
In the sentence "She slept very badly whenever she stayed with her grandparents", the activity 'slept' is part of the whole activity 'stayed' -- it doesn't interrupt 'stayed' -- it's part of the same activity. . _________________ "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power." ~ Abraham Lincoln |
|
Yankee I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 16 Apr 2006 Posts: 8316 Location: USA
|
 |
|
| I think the word 'oftuberculosis' should be modified to 'of tuberculosis' | when to use whose or who? |