|
|
Sat Dec 29, 2007 22:46 pm dangerous dogs |
|
|
In the US, it's different in every state and every county.
As far as I know, in my state of Michigan there's no law against owning a specific type of dog, including a Rotweiler, pit bull terrier or even a German shepherd / wolf mix. However, if the dog attacks someone, there are penalties to both the dog and the owner:
| Quote: | | Any person including a law enforcement officer may kill any dog which he sees in the act of pursuing, worrying, or wounding any livestock or poultry or attacking persons, and there shall be no liability on such person in damages or otherwise, for such killing. |
| Quote: | | Upon the return day fixed in the summons the township supervisor or township officer or other person designated by the township board shall proceed to determine whether the loss or damage to the livestock was caused by the dog, and if so he or she shall immediately notify the sheriff or the animal control officer of the county of that fact and upon notification the sheriff or the animal control officer shall kill the dog wherever found. |
This isn't necessarily the end of it. The owner is liable for monetary or other damages, and if the dog kills someone, the owner is found guilty as if he had killed the person himself. In recent months, two people have gone to prison for manslaughter because their pit bulls or Rotweilers killed someone. |
|
Jamie (K) I'm a Communicator ;-)
Joined: 24 Feb 2006 Posts: 4106 Location: Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
|
Sun Dec 30, 2007 7:28 am dangerous dogs |
|
|
...if only the sentences were so severe for those who kill dogs without provocation.
(dog person here) _________________ Billie Jean is not my lover. Hee. |
|
prezbucky I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 2018 Location: Nashville, TN (USA)
|
 |
Sun Dec 30, 2007 7:29 am dangerous dogs |
|
|
and the people who starve them and/or leave them in isolation to "prepare" them for dog-fighting... ought to be pistol-whipped whilst tethered to a tree -- and then sent to prison.
(I'm not a member of PETA -- just a big fan of canis familiaris) _________________ Billie Jean is not my lover. Hee. |
|
prezbucky I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 2018 Location: Nashville, TN (USA)
|
 |
Sun Dec 30, 2007 7:39 am dangerous dogs |
|
|
oh, almost forgot -- I hope y'all had a Merry Christmas.
...and here's to a Happy New Year in a couple of days! _________________ Billie Jean is not my lover. Hee. |
|
prezbucky I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 2018 Location: Nashville, TN (USA)
|
 |
Sun Dec 30, 2007 15:17 pm dangerous dogs |
|
|
| prezbucky wrote: | | and the people who starve them and/or leave them in isolation to "prepare" them for dog-fighting... ought to be pistol-whipped whilst tethered to a tree -- and then sent to prison. |
Our law gets pretty tough on those people also:
| Quote: | | If a person incites an animal trained or used for fighting or an animal that is the first or second generation offspring of an animal trained or used for fighting to attack a person and thereby causes the death of that person, the owner is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for life or for a term of years greater than 15 years. |
You can even go to jail for as long as three months in my state for tethering a dog on too short a leash. |
|
Jamie (K) I'm a Communicator ;-)
Joined: 24 Feb 2006 Posts: 4106 Location: Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
 |
Sun Dec 30, 2007 16:37 pm dangerous dogs |
|
|
cool
...though for just tethering it on too short a leash, three months might be a little bit harsh.
for that they could give the person a fine and probation, in which the parole officer shows up once a month to check on the mutt _________________ Billie Jean is not my lover. Hee. |
|
prezbucky I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 2018 Location: Nashville, TN (USA)
|
 |
Mon Dec 31, 2007 0:23 am dangerous dogs |
|
|
In Germany, there is no strict prohibition of any breed of dogs. Primarily, some years ago, the government tried to establish such a law but lots of dog-keepers defended their right to choose a breed. So, instead of a prohibition, the government concieved another possibility of ruling the dog keeping.
1st - they classified dogs to their usual degree of exposure. As much as I know there are three classes:
-attack dogs: as there are pit bulls, Great Danes, Staffordshires, Rottweilers and all other that are expected to be dangerous
-great but no attack dogs i.e. dogs from a height of more than 40 cm (measured at the shoulder) or a weight of more than 20 kilogramms
-all the others (Westies and so on)
to hamper keeping attack dogs they raised higher taxes for the first class I mentioned above. (everyone who knows me here can imagine what I think of such taxes )
2nd- (and to me more sensible sounding) keepers have to get attestations of their character and ability of keeping and leading a dog and additional they need an attestation concerning the character of their dog (innocuousness). The degree of the certificates depends on the breed of their dog.
3rd- attack dogs must wear a muzzle and be leashed outside of fenced in area.
All these rules cannot assure a safe cooperation between humans and animals (since even animals are individuals with their own feelings and daily behave) but anyhow I think, they might help to minimize the risk. Finally, dogs aren´t crocodiles or wildcats; the huge majority of them are social beings and can be taught and educated (they even expect that from their keeper). In that sense I agree with Tom´s recent post.
Regards
Michael |
|
Fan of Arabian horses I'm here quite often ;-)

Joined: 20 Apr 2006 Posts: 813
|
 |
Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:36 am dangerous dogs |
|
|
yeah, they've had thousands of years to learn to hang with us.
it all started when the first caveman tossed that first scrap of meat to the wolves waiting in the distance, staring at the fire and wondering what on earth those pelt-garbed beings were doing so close to the flames. _________________ Billie Jean is not my lover. Hee. |
|
prezbucky I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 2018 Location: Nashville, TN (USA)
|
 |
Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:39 am dangerous dogs |
|
|
I wonder if the wolves -- who would become dogs -- first became our pets (EG, hanging out with us, letting us pet them, etc.) or our protectors. Which job came first on the wolf-dog timeline? _________________ Billie Jean is not my lover. Hee. |
|
prezbucky I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 2018 Location: Nashville, TN (USA)
|
 |
Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:39 am dangerous dogs |
|
|
or did they first help us by aiding in the hunt?
I wonder what happened the first time a man and a wolf grabbed hold of the prey at the same time. hehe
I suppose the preceding stuff foments the following question:
In which way did wolves first serve man? a) Hunting b) Security/protection c) Social capacity -- petting, licking, playing, etc. _________________ Billie Jean is not my lover. Hee. |
|
prezbucky I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 2018 Location: Nashville, TN (USA)
|
 |
Mon Dec 31, 2007 4:18 am dangerous dogs |
|
|
| prezbucky wrote: | | I wonder if the wolves -- who would become dogs -- first became our pets (EG, hanging out with us, letting us pet them, etc.) or our protectors. Which job came first on the wolf-dog timeline? |
I think you can figure out what happened by watching what goes on with squirrels on a typical American college or university campus. A student drops a piece of food that he doesn't want anymore, or one that's yucky to people but delicious to squirrels. It could even be an apple core. The squirrel figures out that people have food, so it starts to hang closer to people. The people think it's cute, so they start offering it food on the condition that the squirrel comes closer. Soon the squirrel loses its fear and becomes a mascot, even tagging along behind guards as they make their rounds in the buildings.
I'll bet that early dogs realized that if they pointed out game to a band of hunters, the humans could kill it with arrows faster than the dog could chase it, and would then give the dog some of the meat. A dog can't eat a whole deer anyway, so as long as it got its fill, it was a good deal to cooperate with the hunters. The best ones get bred, and soon you've got hunting dogs that will do it just for fun or praise. |
|
Jamie (K) I'm a Communicator ;-)
Joined: 24 Feb 2006 Posts: 4106 Location: Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
 |
Mon Dec 31, 2007 6:21 am dangerous dogs |
|
|
In Malaysia, any dogs can be vicious. Unlike in Japan, dog owners bring their dogs for a walk, so the dogs are friendly and don't attack people for unknown reasons. But in Malaysia, the dogs are trained to be vicious. One Chinese fellow told my father, they deliberately mix the dog food with human phlegm to make the dog that eats it even more vicious. I know, eww.
I am not a dog person, for one reason. I have been chased by dogs so many times and attacked by one German Shepherd one time. Me and my sister were walking to our Koran class and suddenly I felt something tugging my skirt. And then I saw this HUMONGOUS thing eating my skirt! My sister was frozen and I was struggling trying to get my skirt back, crying. In the midst of all that the owner finally came and pulled the dog away from me. Since then I HATE dogs.
My father reported it to the police but nothing happened because I was unharmed. Emotionally, yes. Now, I freeze when I see a dog, one of the reason I cannot jog on a jogging track, too many people bring their dogs jogging. I get sweaty and nervous and I won't be able to move, let alone to jog.
Come to think of it, I don't like any animals for that matter. Even cats scare me. _________________ Okotteru Papa mo suki dakedo, nikoniko yasashii Papa ha mo~tto suki! |
|
NinaZara I'm here quite often ;-)

Joined: 04 Jan 2007 Posts: 930 Location: Japan
|
 |
Mon Dec 31, 2007 7:15 am dangerous dogs |
|
|
Jamie, that makes sense. I figured it either would have been hunting or protection, with the companionship coming later.
Probably food first
Then protection (gotta guard the food, which means guarding the people who get the food)
Then companionship
--------
Nina
You poor thing!
My little dog Molly (15 pounds -- probably a schnauzer/papillon or schnauzer/silky terrier mix) loves her mama and I, but barks or growls at everyone else . She also barks and growls at other dogs. Pardon my language, but she can be a bitch -- literally, of course, and figuratively. hehe
At the same time, she has a ton of spunk -- will run in circles and figure-eights for play, dig holes, and try to hump cats if any are around -- we don't really get that last thing, but that little bugger likes cats. If you utter the phrase "kitty cat" she'll bolt for the door. She knows how to sit, shake, lay down (crap, I've forgotten the lay/lie rule), and dance on her hind feet.
We put treats into an eight-ounce milk carton and close the carton. She will open the carton with her paws and teeth and then throw the carton around until the treats fall out. She's something. When I get home, she's at the door, overjoyed that I'm home. I squat down and she jumps up, puts her front paws on my shoulders, and starts to lick me. then i pet her for a minute, start making weird noises,, and she freaks and starts running back and forth across the living room. sudden movements or noises (or both) trigger this playfulness in her. she's a great dog. _________________ Billie Jean is not my lover. Hee. |
|
prezbucky I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 2018 Location: Nashville, TN (USA)
|
 |
Mon Dec 31, 2007 7:20 am dangerous dogs |
|
|
Wow, Tom. Molly sure has a personality. Still, she is liable to make me cry like a babe. I am afraid of all dogs, big or small. _________________ Okotteru Papa mo suki dakedo, nikoniko yasashii Papa ha mo~tto suki! |
|
NinaZara I'm here quite often ;-)

Joined: 04 Jan 2007 Posts: 930 Location: Japan
|
 |
|
| Kraków is a great place to visit | New Year's Celebration |