|
|
Sat Apr 12, 2008 3:24 am for instead of because |
|
|
Using "for" instead of because sounds a bit archaic and formal, something like an old storybook. I have a friend who always says "because" but writes "for", and I don't understand why she does it. However, they still teach American children that "for" is one of the alternatives.
We also use "since" instead of "because", but that sounds normal. |
|
Jamie (K) I'm a Communicator ;-)
Joined: 24 Feb 2006 Posts: 4225 Location: Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
|
Sat Apr 12, 2008 9:23 am for instead of because |
|
|
You can see the registers that use of "for" is normally found in in contemporary British English (per million words):
SPOKEN 0.0 FICTION 0.4 NEWSPAPER 0.7 ACADEMIC 0.6 MISC 0.5
And in American English registers:
SPOKEN 0.1 FICTION 0.4 MAGAZINE 0.2 NEWSPAPER 0.1 ACADEMIC 0.3
As far as Time magazine is concerned, that use seems to have had it's ups and downs of popularity over the decades:
1920s 0.5 1930s 0.5 1940s 0.3 1950s 0.5 1960s 0.2 1970s 0.2 1980s 0.0 1990s 0.1 2000s 0.5 Source: http://view.byu.edu/ |
|
Molly I'm a Communicator ;-)
Joined: 12 Feb 2008 Posts: 2878
|
 |
Sat Apr 12, 2008 9:30 am for instead of because |
|
|
There are places where the choice of "for" just sounds right:
"Smile at us, pay us, pass us. But do not quite forget. / For we are the people of England, that never have spoken yet”.
GK Chesterton
"We are the champions, my friend.. And weee'll keep on fighting til' the end...We are the champions, we are the champions, no time for losers, for we are the champions...... of the world!"
Freddie Mercury |
|
Molly I'm a Communicator ;-)
Joined: 12 Feb 2008 Posts: 2878
|
 |
Sat Apr 12, 2008 11:15 am for instead of because |
|
|
| thank you |
|
M3dic I'm new here and I like it ;-)
Joined: 19 Jan 2008 Posts: 18
|
 |
|
| Is 'the' required here? | A special usage if Past perfect tense? |