Google
English-Test.net
Find penpals and make new friends today!
 
at the end; last; ultimate; decisive; conclusive; definitive
initiative
convenient
final
town
full quiz correct answer
 
Username
Password
 Remember me? 
Search   Album   FAQ   Memberlist   Profile   Private messages   Register   Log in 

A special usage if Past perfect tense?



 
ESL/EFL Worksheets and Handouts for Students Printable, photocopiable, clearly structured
Designed for teachers and individual learners
For use in a classroom, at home, on your PC
ESL Forums | English Vocabulary, Grammar and Idioms
for instead of because | 'Demonstrable' -a form of 'demonstrate'?
listening exercisestell a friend
Message
Author
A special usage if Past perfect tense? #1 (permalink) Fri Apr 11, 2008 15:13 pm   A special usage if Past perfect tense?
 

Hello,
Would you please have a look at this sentence : "Dave didn't sign the contract until he had spoken to his lawyer.''
I think there is something wrong with the usage Past perfect tense here because it is used to say about one action which took place before another in the past.And here in this sentence it is used to say about one action occuring after another.
Please explain it for me.
_________________
Don't see your shade think you are great
Duc
I'm here quite often ;-)


Joined: 18 Nov 2007
Posts: 260
Location: Vietnam

A special usage if Past perfect tense? #2 (permalink) Fri Apr 11, 2008 16:22 pm   A special usage if Past perfect tense?
 

Quote:
Firts action: he spoke to his lawyer.
Second action: he signed.


The action with the lawyer is the past of the signing action. Past perfect is fine in that case.
Molly
I'm a Communicator ;-)


Joined: 12 Feb 2008
Posts: 4017

What do you know about the progressive forms?English grammar exercises — improve your English knowledge and vocabulary skillsAre you a native speaker of English? Then you should read this!Read these English anecdotes and maybe smile today? Subscribe to free email English course
A special usage if Past perfect tense? #3 (permalink) Sat Apr 12, 2008 2:37 am   A special usage if Past perfect tense?
 

Yes, the past perfect is quite correct in that sentence. Remember that the sequence of the events in an English sentence isn't always connected to their sequence in time.
Jamie (K)
I'm a Communicator ;-)


Joined: 24 Feb 2006
Posts: 6552
Location: Detroit, Michigan, USA

A special usage if Past perfect tense? #4 (permalink) Sat Apr 12, 2008 6:02 am   A special usage if Past perfect tense?
 

Jamie (K) wrote:
isn't always connected to their sequence in time.
Did you mean to say 'their sequence in the sentence', Jamie?
.
_________________
"Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power." ~ Abraham Lincoln
Yankee
I'm a Communicator ;-)


Joined: 16 Apr 2006
Posts: 8316
Location: USA

A special usage if Past perfect tense? #5 (permalink) Sat Apr 12, 2008 7:43 am   A special usage if Past perfect tense?
 

I think he did mean to.
Molly
I'm a Communicator ;-)


Joined: 12 Feb 2008
Posts: 4017

A special usage if Past perfect tense? #6 (permalink) Sat Apr 12, 2008 11:22 am   A special usage if Past perfect tense?
 

I said:

Quote:
Remember that the sequence of the events in an English sentence isn't always connected to their sequence in time.

That's what I meant to say.

Look at these two sentences:

a. "Dave didn't sign the contract until he had spoken to his lawyer.''
b. "Until he had spoken to his lawyer, Dave didn't sign the contract."


The order of events in time is: (1) speak to the lawyer, (2) sign the contract. However, in the sentences, even though they mean exactly the same thing, the sequence in sentence (a) is (2)(1), and the sequence in sentence (b) is (1)(2). Which clause comes first in the sentence is unconnected to which event happened first in time.

Duc wrote this sentence:
"Dave didn't sign the contract until he had spoken to his lawyer.''

And he said about it:
Quote:
I think there is something wrong with the usage Past perfect tense here because it is used to say about one action which took place before another in the past.And here in this sentence it is used to say about one action occuring after another.

His confusion appears to to be that in the example sentence the first event is mentioned after the second event.
Jamie (K)
I'm a Communicator ;-)


Joined: 24 Feb 2006
Posts: 6552
Location: Detroit, Michigan, USA

Display posts from previous:   
for instead of because | 'Demonstrable' -a form of 'demonstrate'?
ESL Forums | English Vocabulary, Grammar and Idioms All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1
Latest topics on ESL EFL Forums
Expression: Either or is fine...Phrasal verb: Get through'Imitative' in vs 'imitative' of?What does 'earthly spendor' mean?What does 'embarrassing variety' mean?role of 'being'What does the word poor mean to you?problem with'help'Is 'the' required here?Expression: "Have any of you met him before?"The use of 'equation' in this sentenceNeither you nor I am going to the shopescalope or schnitzel?

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Subscribe to FREE email English course
First name E-mail