|
|
#2 (permalink) Wed May 07, 2008 8:45 am "ignore vs "be ignorant of" |
|
|
Hi Nessie,
IMO, 1/ to ignore means to disregard while "be ignorant of" suggests "without knowledge of". 2/ I don't think any two different words could mean 100% the same thing but sometimes they are exchangeable in usage such as "should" and "ought to". However, strictly speaking, 'should' is an aux. while 'ought to' a verb. Also, the latter takes on a sense of obligation while the former bears it less.
Haihao |
|
Haihao I'm a Communicator ;-)
Joined: 26 Oct 2006 Posts: 2471 Location: Japan
|
|
#3 (permalink) Wed May 07, 2008 11:11 am "ignore vs "be ignorant of" |
|
|
| Quote: |
| However, strictly speaking, 'should' is an aux. while 'ought to' a verb. |
Isn't "ought to" a quasi/semi-auxiliary? |
|
Molly I'm a Communicator ;-)
Joined: 12 Feb 2008 Posts: 4017
|
 |
#4 (permalink) Wed May 07, 2008 11:25 am "ignore vs "be ignorant of" |
|
|
| Oh, yes, I agree with you. It's an auxiliary as well. Sorry, my mistake. |
|
Haihao I'm a Communicator ;-)
Joined: 26 Oct 2006 Posts: 2471 Location: Japan
|
 |
#5 (permalink) Fri May 09, 2008 11:38 am "ignore vs "be ignorant of" |
|
|
Thanks a lot, Haihao and Molly, and may I have your idea, Amy? _________________ :(... something we never have again, I know... I guess I really really know.. :(
Sorry seems to be the hardest word... |
|
Nessie I'm a Communicator ;-)
Joined: 16 Feb 2008 Posts: 1102
|
 |
|
| Soil vs earth | first time, last time |