|
|
#2 (permalink) Thu May 29, 2008 13:50 pm restrictions on relative pronouns |
|
|
Hi SP
I agree with you that sentence 1 is awkward. I'm not sure that I understood your question/comment about 'him', but I think I did. I disagree that the word 'who' could be replaced by 'him' (i.e. 'whom') in that sentence. The word 'who' serves as the subject of a clause. In other words, it is not grammatically correct to say 'Him is standing under the tree.'
'Who is standing under the tree' should identify which man you are referring to, and presumably not which nephew.
Sentence 2 is far more typical, and and the grammar is fine. It would also be quite typical to reduce it to this: - The man standing under the tree is my nephew. . _________________ "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power." ~ Abraham Lincoln |
|
Yankee I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 16 Apr 2006 Posts: 8316 Location: USA
|
|
#3 (permalink) Thu May 29, 2008 18:40 pm restrictions on relative pronouns |
|
|
Hi Molly,
I'd rather you remove your latest post as it does not contribute to answering Sweetpumpkin's question.
Thanks, Torsten
TOEIC listening, photographs: Working on the bridge structure |
|
Torsten Learning Coach

Joined: 25 Sep 2003 Posts: 14501 Location: EU
|
 |
#4 (permalink) Thu May 29, 2008 21:57 pm restrictions on relative pronouns |
|
|
If you don't understand the relevance of my reply, you must act accordingly, Torsten.
I'd say that would be the first time I've seen you do your job as moderator. |
|
Molly I'm a Communicator ;-)
Joined: 12 Feb 2008 Posts: 4017
|
 |
|
| what is the difference? | 'on a hiding to nothing' and 'dollars to doughnuts' and '6 to 1' |