|
|
#2 (permalink) Mon Jul 21, 2008 11:39 am adequately answered |
|
|
. Ouch! Adequately or not, Resp 1 needs keelhauling. (It wasn't me, was it?) . _________________ Native English teacher at Mister Micawber's |
|
Mister Micawber Language Coach
Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 13015
|
|
#3 (permalink) Mon Jul 21, 2008 11:42 am adequately answered |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Resp 1 needs keelhauling |
Why so? |
|
Molly I'm a Communicator ;-)
Joined: 12 Feb 2008 Posts: 4017
|
 |
#4 (permalink) Mon Jul 21, 2008 11:44 am adequately answered |
|
|
. She is rude. . _________________ Native English teacher at Mister Micawber's |
|
Mister Micawber Language Coach
Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 13015
|
 |
#5 (permalink) Mon Jul 21, 2008 11:48 am adequately answered |
|
|
| Mister Micawber wrote: |
. She is rude. . |
And it were put in this way:
"Native/non-native respondent 2, the initial question here has been adequately discussed. Please don't distract learners by saying when you think a response is not adequate. It's both boring and misleading."
Still rude? |
|
Molly I'm a Communicator ;-)
Joined: 12 Feb 2008 Posts: 4017
|
 |
#6 (permalink) Mon Jul 21, 2008 12:08 pm adequately answered |
|
|
. Yep. I don't think one respondent should presume upon another, generally (present company excepted, of course). . _________________ Native English teacher at Mister Micawber's |
|
Mister Micawber Language Coach
Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 13015
|
 |
#7 (permalink) Mon Jul 21, 2008 12:10 pm adequately answered |
|
|
| Mister Micawber wrote: |
. Yep. I don't think one respondent should presume upon another, generally (present company excepted, of course). . |
Never seen you be rude, as moderator, MrM. |
|
Molly I'm a Communicator ;-)
Joined: 12 Feb 2008 Posts: 4017
|
 |
#8 (permalink) Mon Jul 21, 2008 12:29 pm adequately answered |
|
|
| Molly wrote: |
| Mister Micawber wrote: |
. She is rude. . |
And it were put in this way:
"Native/non-native respondent 2, the initial question here has been adequately discussed. Please don't distract learners by saying when you think a response is not adequate. It's both boring and misleading."
Still rude? |
Nice little stunt your pulling here, Molly.
Here's what happened in different thread:
Learner: Can you use 'who' for animals? Ralf: Yes, but you should only do that in case you want to attach human qualities to animals. Example: He's a good horse who wins many races.
...13 comments later
Molly: Your example is wrong. Shouldn't it be "He's a good horse that wins many races"? Ralf: Molly, the initial question here has been adequately discussed. Please don't distract learners by singling out quotes and putting them out of context. It's both boring and misleading. (Please quote correctly)
Contributor Molly deletes his original comment and starts a new thread trying to lure people into saying "Ralf is bad." Well done.
http://www.english-test.net/forum/ftopic26765.html _________________ Test of English as a Foreign Language TOEFL Preparation & TOEFL Vocabulary Learn more: How to Become an English Teacher |
|
Ralf Language Coach

Joined: 20 Apr 2006 Posts: 1564 Location: EU (Ireland and Germany)
|
 |
#9 (permalink) Mon Jul 21, 2008 12:48 pm adequately answered |
|
|
. As I say, present company excepted, Ralf. Ain't she a peach? . _________________ Native English teacher at Mister Micawber's |
|
Mister Micawber Language Coach
Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 13015
|
 |
|
| Forum stalkers? | Diving in Aqaba, Eilat or Dahab? |