|
|
Tue Apr 05, 2005 10:37 am Can |
|
|
The auxiliary can is a so called defective verb because there is no infinitive form and no past participle. This means that you have to use other words to replace these missing parts. You use the infinitive after will and so you use the alternative form be able, which acts as the substitute. _________________ English as a Second Language You can read my ESL story Sea Expressions |
|
Alan Co-founder

Joined: 27 Sep 2003 Posts: 7283 Location: UK
|
|
Sat Jul 19, 2008 15:34 pm Difference between can and be able to |
|
|
That's ok. But, in this case: After the accident he was no longer able to walk. Could I use "can" or "could" in the case? How would it be? |
|
daltomaciel I'm new here and I like it ;-)
Joined: 18 Jul 2008 Posts: 18
|
 |
Sun Jul 20, 2008 10:02 am Difference between can and be able to |
|
|
'After the accident he was no longer able to walk.' 'After the accident, he could no longer walk.'
Both are acceptable, yes. However, you might also hear the 2nd version as: 'After the accident, he couldn't walk.' or 'After the accident, he couldn't walk anymore.' |
|
Skrej I'm here quite often ;-)

Joined: 03 Jul 2008 Posts: 161 Location: Not-quite exact central U.S.
|
 |
Mon Jul 21, 2008 14:09 pm Difference between can and be able to |
|
|
In my opinion, the difference kicks in, when you need to use "can" in the past tense and in affirmative sentences, as in: 1. He was able to climb the mountain on that date 2. In his youth, he could climb mountains |
|
lost_soul I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 15 Sep 2006 Posts: 1746 Location: South Park, Colorado, USA
|
 |
|
| Difference between ought to and should | Difference between signify and mean |