|
|
#2 (permalink) Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:46 am There seem to have been no eye-witnesses to the murder, ...? |
|
|
. So many choices, so little time. I said 'were there?' when I tried it on myself. . _________________ Native English teacher at Mister Micawber's |
|
Mister Micawber Language Coach
Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 13015
|
|
#3 (permalink) Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:56 am There seem to have been no eye-witnesses to the murder, ...? |
|
|
Hi Volcano,
As a rule of thumb, you should look for the first verb in a statement to use in the question tag. In your example it's 'seem' followed by the present perfect, that makes it tricky. I'd go with 'have there'.
There seem to be no eye-witnesses, are there?
There aren't any witnesses, are there?
There weren't/were no witnesses, were there?
There don't seem to be any witnesses, do there/are there? _________________ Test of English as a Foreign Language TOEFL Preparation & TOEFL Vocabulary Learn more: How to Become an English Teacher |
|
Ralf Language Coach

Joined: 20 Apr 2006 Posts: 1564 Location: EU (Ireland and Germany)
|
 |
#4 (permalink) Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:46 pm There seem to have been no eye-witnesses to the murder, ...? |
|
|
There seem to have been no eye-witnesses to the murder, right/eh?
And why "seem" and not "seems"? |
|
Molly I'm a Communicator ;-)
Joined: 12 Feb 2008 Posts: 4017
|
 |
|
| who replaces who? | dear or not? |