#1 (permalink) Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:56 pm dear or not? |
|
|
Whether the remarkable growth of organized camping means the eventual death of the more independent kind is hard to say. Municipalities naturally want to secure the campers' site fees and other custom. Police are wary of itinerants who cannot be traced to a recognized camp boundary or to four walls. But most probably it will all depend upon campers themselves: how many heath fires they cause; how much litter they leave; in short, whether or not they wholly alienate landowners and those who live in the countryside. Only good scouting is likely to preserve the freedoms so dear to the heart of the eternal Boy Scout.
I don't know exactly how to grasp the highlighted sentence, which of the following two is closer to its meaning?
1. Freedoms are not so dear to an eternal Boy Scout, but good scouting can make them dearer.
2. Freedoms are very dear to an eternal Boy Scout, but he will be losing them if scouting is bad.
furthermore, i am not quite clear with this paragraph, what points does the author make? why does he mention the Boy Scout? does he agree more with the organized camping than the independent one, or otherwise? which kind of camping do the Municipalities and police prefer, the organized one or the independent one? |
|
Iwanna I'm here quite often ;-)
Joined: 15 Sep 2007 Posts: 112
|