|
|
#2 (permalink) Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:42 am "Work for" vs "work in" |
|
|
. Your course book explanation is a guideline, not a prescription.
At the moment, he is working IN/FOR a travel agency. Are you going to work IN/FOR a clothing company in Edinburgh?
These are all OK. Another, simpler guideline: Use 'for' for the organization and 'in' for the place. . _________________ Native English teacher at Mister Micawber's |
|
Mister Micawber Language Coach

Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 7432 Location: Yokohama, Japan
|
|
#3 (permalink) Tue Mar 24, 2009 9:53 am "Work for" vs "work in" |
|
|
Thank you very much, that's just what I needed to understand I wonder how I couldn't guess it before, because it is really very simple  |
|
Lenakul I'm new here and I like it ;-)
Joined: 18 Sep 2008 Posts: 10 Location: Russia
|
 |
#4 (permalink) Thu Mar 26, 2009 15:24 pm Work for vs work in |
|
|
| I've just thought about something else. Is there any initial reason of existing these two variants when speaking about somebody's job? Does a speaker imply anything when he says: "Helen works FOR this organisation" (for example, that Helen is not a director of this organisation)? |
|
Lenakul I'm new here and I like it ;-)
Joined: 18 Sep 2008 Posts: 10 Location: Russia
|
 |
#5 (permalink) Thu Mar 26, 2009 15:40 pm "Work for" vs "work in" |
|
|
It does not matter whether Helen is a director or not if she is not, the owner of the company. One can work for an employer and work at/in a company. I work at a Fire Department, I work for the City of Cityname. _________________ con·text - The part of a text or statement that surrounds a particular word or passage and determines its meaning. |
|
Milanya I'm here quite often ;-)

Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 841 Location: Texas, USA (at present)
|
 |
|
| in or at or both? | How to create a "New Topic"? |