 #1 (permalink) Sat Apr 18, 2009 5:56 am In the interest of Justice |
|
|
In the interest of Justice
I told MD/Owner of the company that I worked for that the new system would expose his wrong doings and he would not be able to hide dodgy transactions like he was
able to in the old system
Things went downhill for me since than, harassment, bullying,
very long hours "I had to quit the job"
I cannot afford to pay a solicitor and have to fight this on my own
Went down tribunal route after statutory grievance etc. filled in ET1
got a response from employer which says
Response dated 23/12/08 received in Jan 2009
"It is denied that the claimant has suffered any detriment short of
dismissal because he has exercised any rights under the Public Interest
Disclosure act in voicing concerns over the respondents conduct.
It is denied that the claimant has been dismissed for making a
disclosure in the public interest or at all. The claimant resigned.
The claimant was not dismissed"
I sent some evidence of wrong doing to the respondent which proves fraud and they are now making the following statement to the court.
Response in april 2009 after hard evidence being sent
"It is denied that the Claimant made any disclosure to the Respondent in
relation to his concerns about supposed allegations of fraud or deceit with the
Respondent’s suppliers. As such, the Respondent submits the Tribunal has no
jurisdiction to hear this part of his claim and that this part of his claim should
be struck out. Alternatively, that the matter be set down for a Pre-Hearing
Review to determine whether or not a disclosure was made"
I know in the first paragraph there is no clear admission of disclosure being made, but can it be inferred from the paragraph and why is the tribunal not looking at reply in December. unless I can prove that I told the employer and at the moment it is my word against his and judge will not even take the next step to look at the evidence:( |
|
 Bangi
New Member
Joined: 17 Apr 2009
Posts: 6
|
