|
|
#2 (permalink) Wed May 27, 2009 6:31 am If i was a policeman vs if i were policemen |
|
|
Hi, I think the second one is correct ,because in conditional sentences type(2) it's gramatically correct to use WERE not WAS: If I were you,I would tell her the truth. If he were a policeman,he could catch thieves/robbers red-handed. However,both WAS and WERE are right when IT is a subject: :shock: If it was/were nice today,we could go on a picnic. Hope this helps, Morteza |
|
Morteza I'm here quite often ;-)

Joined: 31 Oct 2008 Posts: 443 Location: Iran
|
|
#3 (permalink) Wed May 27, 2009 7:48 am If i was a policeman vs if i were policemen |
|
|
. The subject is irrelevant. 'Were' is the formal subjunctive form for conditions contrary to fact: 'If I were king', 'if it were sunny today'. However, this form is being replaced by the indicative 'was', which is now common in conversation. Both relate to the present.
For a reference to past fact, 'was' is fine: 'If I was rude last night, please forgive me', 'If you were rude last night, I forgive you'. . _________________ Native English teacher at Mister Micawber's |
|
Mister Micawber Language Coach
Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 13015
|
 |
#4 (permalink) Wed May 27, 2009 16:38 pm If i was a policeman vs if i were policemen |
|
|
Thank you Mr Mister Micawber for your clarification. you have made a nice point . were is the formal contrary to fact.
Can we say: If I was a policeman I could arrest him last night. |
|
Muller I'm new here and I like it ;-)
Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 21
|
 |
#5 (permalink) Wed May 27, 2009 16:43 pm If i was a policeman vs if i were policemen |
|
|
Hey Morteza, I did not know if it can go with both was and were. Thank you for the explanation Muller |
|
Muller I'm new here and I like it ;-)
Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 21
|
 |
#6 (permalink) Wed May 27, 2009 17:10 pm If i was a policeman vs if i were policemen |
|
|
| Muller wrote: |
Thank you Mr Mister Micawber for your clarification. you have made a nice point . were is the formal contrary to fact.
Can we say: If I was a policeman I could arrest him last night. |
Hello Muller,
It's nice to see you are trying to improve your grammar. Keep going!
The first part of your sentence is okay, but the second one is not.
It should read: 'If I was a policeman, I would have arrested him last night.'
I cannot explain this to you, but maybe a teacher could.
Best regards. |
|
SkiIucK I'm here quite often ;-)
Joined: 09 Oct 2006 Posts: 850
|
 |
#7 (permalink) Wed May 27, 2009 20:07 pm If i was a policeman vs if i were policemen |
|
|
Hello everybody
We usually use the subjunctive were instead of "was" after if (and other words with similar meaning). Look at these sentences:
- If I were you, I would ask her. - Suppose she were here. What would you say?
We sometimes hear things like "if I were you, I would go" or "if he were here, he would tell you". Normally, the past tense of the verb "to be" is: I was, he was. But the if I were you structure does not use the past simple tense of the verb "to be". It uses the past subjunctive of the verb "to be
in formal we say If I were younger, I would go but, in informal we say If I was younger, I would go.
We do not normally say "if I was you", even in familiar conversation. _________________ Give your smile to everyone but give your heart to only one |
|
Rfaleet I'm here quite often ;-)

Joined: 23 Feb 2009 Posts: 107
|
 |
#8 (permalink) Mon Jun 01, 2009 13:37 pm If i was a policeman vs if i were policemen |
|
|
Hello Mr SkiIuck, Thank you so much for the correction, there is a saying in English <say learning by doing>, I hope your correction will stick in my mind and I won't make any mistake with that form again. I am improving Best Regards Muller |
|
Muller I'm new here and I like it ;-)
Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 21
|
 |
|
| experienced vs. proficient vs. competent | It's not to my liking. vs It's not for my liking. |