Teachers' pay should be depended on how successfully their students learn

[Mahesh1]

Teachers play a pivotal role in the success of the students.So,teachers should be rewarded with the high pay for their great efforts and skills.However,as for as teachers' basic pay is concerned ,it should not be change.Parameters to evaluate success of the teachers,however, seems full of entangle. It's much depend on how one evaluate the success of the teachers,difference in subjects being taught to the children and lot's more.There are many reasons to oppose this arguement.

First,there is a wide difference in the students' intellectual.One may grasp everything taught by teacher.On contrary,one may not get that or, he or she doesn't want to get that.Is it fault on teachers' side?The answer probably will be no.Even a world class teachers cannot give assurance that their students will become doctors, engineers,authors or something else.

Second,teachers' success should be rewarded with the bonus system rather than the change in the basic pay.For instance,does the science teacher should be paid less just because their students not do very well? history teacher paid more than the science teacher because their students do well in the academics?It's seems irrational.So,their should not be change in the basic pay but bonus system will provide them good incentives to do best.

In a nut shell,teachers should not be paid less just because their low intellectual students.However, in order to provide good encouragement to teacher for their good teaching skills they should be rewarded with nice incentives rather than to change their basic pay scale.

TOEFL listening lectures: What aspect of USA Today does the professor mainly discuss?

[Mahesh1]

please grade my essay ,i have exam on the 27 june....

[Kitosdad]

Teachers play a pivotal role in the success of (their) students.So,teachers should be rewarded with (higher) pay for their (greater) efforts and skills.However,as (far) as teachers' basic pay is concerned , it should not be (changed).

Parameters to evaluate (the)success of teachers,however, seems full of (entangle.??)
It depends on how one (evaluates) the success of the teachers,(the)difference in (the)subjects being taught to the children and lots more.There are many reasons to oppose this (argument).

First, there is a wide difference in the students' (intellect).
One may grasp everything taught by (the)teacher. On (the)contrary,one may not get that or, he or she doesn't want to get that. Is it (the)fault (of the) teacher.?
The answer will probably be NO.
Even a world class (teacher) cannot give (an)assurance that their students will become doctors, engineers,authors or something else.

Second,(a) teachers' success should be rewarded with (a) bonus system rather than (a) change in (their) basic pay. For instance,(should) the science teacher be paid less just because their students (do)not do very well? (H)istory teachers (being) paid more than the science teacher because their students do well in the academics? It seems irrational.

So, (there) should not be (a)change in the basic pay, but (rather a)bonus system (which would)provide them (with a)good incentive to do (their)best.

In a nut-shell, teachers should not be paid less just because their students (are of low intellect.)
However, in order to provide (greater) encouragement to (the)teacher(s) for their good teaching skills, they should be rewarded with (an)incentive rather than (a)change (in)their basic pay scale.
_________________
Keep it simple ... Keep it interesting.

[Mahesh1]

Thanks a lot ..kitosdad...

[Mahesh1]

One more question,
Why you mark question mark again word ENTANGLE?I want to express it in the meaning of the "puzzling".

[Kitosdad]

Why didn't you say complications then? :) :)

Anyway, that's a decent essay you've put together there.

Avoid using words whose real meaning you are not sure about. Keep it simple. Keep it interesting.

Kitos.
_________________
Keep it simple ... Keep it interesting.

[Mahesh1]

Thanks kitos...for your quick reply and suggestion..