|
|
 #2 (permalink) Tue Jul 07, 2009 15:15 pm Is there any difference between the two sentences below. |
|
|
Can any explain why the 1st one is better than the the second one?
1) After cutting the vegetables and laying them on the table, the chef's assistant, then started to prepare the meat.
2) The chef's assistant, having cut the vegetables and laying them on the table, then started to prepare the meat.
I am no grammar expert but,
I would say the first is Present Progressive-Continuous.
The second is Present Perfect/Progressive-Continuous.
I would like someone better equipped than I to really explain it.
Kitos.
_________________
Keep it simple ... Keep it interesting. |
|
 Kitosdad
Language Coach
Joined: 04 Mar 2009
Posts: 13417
Location: ESSEN, Germany, (but English.)
|
|
| #3 (permalink) Wed Jul 08, 2009 4:42 am Is there any difference between the two sentences below. |
|
|
Thanks for your reply, Kitos.
I thought both sentences are in the same tense. Sentence (1) does not use "having cut... and laid" because "after" clearly tells what event took place first.
anwyway, these are my questions regarding the sentences.
In sentence (2), what happens if I put "having~table" before "The chef's assistant~ prepare the meat." does this make the sentence any better?
Or what if I say "After (having cut)~ and (laid) them on the table, the chef's assistant~." Is there any difference between this sentence and the sentence (1) above?
thank you. |
|
Ecoke0005
I'm new here and I like it ;-)
Joined: 18 Jun 2009
Posts: 26
|
 |
| #4 (permalink) Wed Jul 08, 2009 6:07 am Is there any difference between the two sentences below. |
|
|
Yes, it is a difficult problem sifting through the subtleties of both sentences, although I hope that Mr.M will say my suggestion is the correct one. (Only hoping mind. :)... as I'm not certain.)
_________________
Keep it simple ... Keep it interesting. |
|
Kitosdad
Language Coach
Joined: 04 Mar 2009
Posts: 13417
Location: ESSEN, Germany, (but English.)
|
|
| #5 (permalink) Wed Jul 08, 2009 10:58 am Is there any difference between the two sentences below. |
|
|
Looks as though "they" are having a long coffee break.
_________________
Keep it simple ... Keep it interesting. |
|
Kitosdad
Language Coach
Joined: 04 Mar 2009
Posts: 13417
Location: ESSEN, Germany, (but English.)
|
|
| #6 (permalink) Wed Jul 08, 2009 23:31 pm Sentence: After cutting the vegetables and laying them on the table,... |
|
|
I guess, both sentences are supposed to mean pretty much the same.
The only thing is that if you say "having cut", then it should be "having laid" as well, not "having cut the vegetables and laying them”. That is why the first sentence is better:):)
It is not about different tenses, but Active and Passive gerund. That's what makes this slight difference in my opinion. |
|
Natasha81
I'm here quite often ;-)
Joined: 18 Jun 2009
Posts: 108
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
|
| #7 (permalink) Thu Jul 09, 2009 0:12 am Sentence: After cutting the vegetables and laying them on the table,... |
|
|
Hello Ecoke,
Sorry, I didn't see your thread until after I'd posted in this thread:
Tense question.
| Ecoke0005 wrote: |
| 1) After cutting the vegetables and laying them on the table, the chef's assistant, then started to prepare the meat. |
Your first sentence contains one too many commas. It should read thus:
- After cutting the vegetables and laying them on the table, the chef's assistant then started to prepare the meat.
Yes, you could also use the perfect form of the participles in sentence 1 with no change in meaning. However, this would be completely unnecessary, so why bother? :lol:
| Ecoke0005 wrote: |
| 2) The chef's assistant, having cut the vegetables and laying them on the table, then started to prepare the meat. |
As I see it, the primary problem with sentence 2 is the use of "laying" rather than "laid" (or "having laid"). The use of the perfect participle places the actions ("cut" and "laid") further in the past than "started". Grammatically speaking, since you have used "having cut", you also need to use the perfect participle "having laid". The use of "laying" would mean that "lay" and "start" happened simultaneously. However, that is clearly not the intended meaning.
Since the two verb forms ("having cut", "having laid") are connected by "and", it is unnecessary to repeat the word "having". I also think separating the subject and the verb with so much additional information tends to make this sentence "clunkier" than the first.
| Natasha81 wrote: |
| It is not about different tenses, but Active and Passive gerund. |
I'm not quite sure what Natasha means by "active and passive gerund" -- at least not in connection with your two sentences. To me a "passive gerund" or a passive participial phrase would include a form of the verb "be". Both of these sentences use passive forms:
- After being told the news, she fainted.
- Having been told that the movie was boring, I decided not to go.
______________________________
"Imagination is more important than knowledge. For while knowledge defines all we currently know and understand, imagination points to all we might yet discover and create." ~ Albert Einstein |
|
Esl_Expert
I'm here quite often ;-)
Joined: 26 Dec 2008
Posts: 969
Location: USA
|
|
| #8 (permalink) Thu Jul 09, 2009 2:37 am Sentence: After cutting the vegetables and laying them on the table,... |
|
|
Oh yeah, sorry, I mixed up the terms, I wanted to say Simple (ing)and Perfect (having+Participal2) Gerunds.
Thank you for correcting me. |
|
Natasha81
I'm here quite often ;-)
Joined: 18 Jun 2009
Posts: 108
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
|
|
| Sentence: I will ask to Miss Jane and I will call you back after I ask her. | Exercise: I know how I (spend) the money my father (give) me last Christmas. |
