Google
English-Test.net
Find penpals and make new friends today!
 
large batch of letters sent at one time by a single sender; rented property
border
recession
leader
mailing
Free TOEIC test: Free word games online: Nouns Quiz Answer
Search   FAQ   Memberlist   Register   Profile   Private messages   Log in 

Emphatic sentenses



 
ESL/EFL Worksheets and Handouts for Students Printable, photocopiable, clearly structured
Designed for teachers and individual learners
For use in a classroom, at home, on your PC
ESL Forums | English Vocabulary, Grammar and Idioms
A lot of and lots of | What does this mean: I'll double dare you?
Message Author
Emphatic sentenses Sat Sep 03, 2005 20:07 pm  Emphatic sentenses
 

Let us suppose we have a sentence:

The special emphasis should be given to the mistake commentation.

And if we want to emphasize the italicized part of the sentence, which is correct way to do that:

1. It is to the mistake commentation that the special emphasis should be given.

2. It is the mistake commentation that the special emphasis should be given to.

And if both are correct, on what does it depend (what does it depend on?) where to put to?

Thank you in advance.
_________________
Factum non fabula
Sidle Jinks
I'm here quite often ;-)


Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 127
Location: Sevastopol, Ukraine

Emphatic sentenses Sun Sep 04, 2005 15:21 pm  Emphatic sentenses
 

"The special emphasis should be given to the mistake commentation"

To who are you referring?
Who are you referring to ?
First, your sentence is difficult to understand.
There is this problem. We may have to refer this to good native grammarians.
Narayanan Krishnaswamy
You can meet me at english-test.net


Joined: 30 Apr 2005
Posts: 67
Location: Coimbatore. India

English grammar exercises — improve your English knowledge and vocabulary skillsHave you read a good anecdote today? Subscribe to free email English courseESL lesson plans in 6 funny stories with exercises and answer keyCan you find all the prepositions in this story?
Emphatic sentenses Sun Sep 04, 2005 15:22 pm  Emphatic sentenses
 

.
Let's work on your original first, Sidle. I would delete the:

Special emphasis should be given to the mistake commentation.

Now, the normal position for new or stressed information in an English sentence is at the end, where you originally have it.

Casting a statement into a cleft-sentence form is a popular grammar exercise in foreign language classes, but the result, as in your examples, is usually awkward and unnatural.

Given that both of your sentences #1 and #2 are odd in that form, the difference would be in the reader's tolerance for the dangling preposition to. Many prescriptive grammarians would still insist on #1.
_________________
Canadian-American native speaker
who teaches English for a living at Mister Micawber's
ESL cafe: Interview with Mr. Micawber
Mister Micawber
Moderator
Mr. Micawber

Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 3662
Location: Yokohama, Japan

Emphatic sentenses Mon Sep 05, 2005 15:49 pm  Emphatic sentenses
 

Narayanan Krishnaswamy wrote:
"The special emphasis should be given to the mistake commentation"

To who are you referring?
Who are you referring to ?
First, your sentence is difficult to understand.
There is this problem. We may have to refer this to good native grammarians.

To who or to whom?

Thank you very much!
_________________
Factum non fabula
Sidle Jinks
I'm here quite often ;-)


Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 127
Location: Sevastopol, Ukraine

Emphatic sentences Mon Sep 05, 2005 15:51 pm  Emphatic sentences
 

Mister Micawber, thank you very much for your explanation!
_________________
Factum non fabula
Sidle Jinks
I'm here quite often ;-)


Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 127
Location: Sevastopol, Ukraine

"Who or whom" Mon Sep 05, 2005 16:57 pm  "Who or whom"
 

'To who or to whom'

'Whom' has lost currency.
Narayanan Krishnaswamy
You can meet me at english-test.net


Joined: 30 Apr 2005
Posts: 67
Location: Coimbatore. India

Whom Tue Sep 06, 2005 10:55 am  Whom
 

Not really. You say the relative pronoun form whom has lost currency but I wonder with whom? Not with me! It is still used in the stressed position after prepositions if for no other reason than that it is easier to say.

Alan
_________________
English as a Second Language
You can read my ESL story Passive Voice
Alan
Co-founder
Alan Townend

Joined: 27 Sep 2003
Posts: 6856
Location: UK

Display posts from previous:   
A lot of and lots of | What does this mean: I'll double dare you?
ESL Forums | English Vocabulary, Grammar and Idioms Emphatic sentenses All times are GMT + 2 Hours
Page 1 of 1
Latest topics on ESL EFL Forums
What does "Betcha" mean?Less people or fewer people?Attribute something as?An adjective or a noun?Simple present-stir; beatSleep your wayDash or hyphen?Wrest and rest?Difference between finally and eventually?What does expression mean: "comeback kid"?Usage of wouldResilience vs resiliency?Need your help with noun phrases...With + gerundWhen you put your money safe in a account bankHow do we sue the preposition 'for'?Shall vs WillVocabulary problemsEmphatic sentenses

Discover English-test.net
As far as I'm concernedWhat about playing with words?What do you think about the so-called (Freedom For Women) in the Mid-East?Social networking on the Internet?SAT test: Vocabulary Words: English AdjectiveSAT test: Word games: Free Online Adjective GameMeaning of inviolable, sequacious, abdominal, well-bred, spinous, antemeridian, pleasantPimsleur Japanese, Comprehensive Course III: Cheap Japanese Pimsleur ProgramEnglish exercises: BudgetingBusiness English idioms handouts: Security Offers8001 Sunset Strip, 1-Month Subscription audiobook download

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Subscribe to FREE email English course written by Alan Townend
First name E-mail