#2 (permalink) Fri Aug 14, 2009 2:43 am the children played vs the children were playing |
|
|
| hi Guzhao67! if I'm right, usually simple past "the children played" shows the fact that happened in the past. but when you use past continious "the children were playing" you want to show the process of doing smth. you can use this time if you want to show, for example, that smth happened during children's play. |
|
Laflor I'm new here and I like it ;-)

Joined: 25 Jul 2009 Posts: 11 Location: USA
|
#3 (permalink) Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:21 am the children played vs the children were playing |
|
|
Guzhao,
Telicity can be difficult to understand because it referrs to the completeness or incompleteness of a verb (phrase), but the meaning of "complete" in this context is not what you will find in the dictionary!
I must say, understanding the concept of telicity as it relates to learning the English language would be a bit like the needing to understand the Pythagorean theory in order to be a cashier. Perhaps you are like me, Guzhao, and love to learn every detail of a subject that interests you.
Here is my best attempt at explaing it:
Telic expression= the action occurs within a specific time frame.
It is natural to say, "Joe built his dream house within a month" whereas it is unnatural to say, "The children played within a month"
Atelic expression= the action occurs without a specific ending time.
It is natural to say, "The children played for a month" but awkward to say, "Joe built his dream house for a month"
Note that even though one might undertand the sentence, "Joe built his dream house for a month" to mean that it took Joe a month to build his dream house, the correct way to say it would be, "Joe spent a month building his dream house" or "It took a month for Joe to build his dream house" etc. |
|
Expatcat I'm here quite often ;-)
Joined: 05 Aug 2009 Posts: 156 Location: Bonn, Germany
|