happy at vs. happy with

[Sweetpumpkin]

Hello,

I have a question of using appropriate prepositions with adjective "happy".

She was happy with the result.
They weren't happy at the news.

I think both "with" and "at" are okay here, but is there any differences between 'happy at' and 'happy with'? Are they replacable? For example.

She was happy at the result.
They weren't happy with the news.

What do you think? I'm wondering.

Thanks,
sweetpumpkin

[BChip]

[Jamie (K)]

"At" and "with" are both possible in those sentences, but there is sometimes a subtle difference.

Usually when "with" is used, it means that the person was supposed to get something from the situation, such as a service, or even just pleasure. For example, a child will be happy "with" his Christmas presents, but never "at", because he is expected to derive some pleasure or benefit from them. Similarly, someone might not be happy "with" his job, because he is not getting the money or satisfaction he expects.

You're more likely to be happy "at" some news or happy "at" someone else's achievement, because they may not benefit you directly.

However, as I said, the difference is subtle, and a native speaker with a tin ear for English may not pick it up.

[Sweetpumpkin]

Thank both of you for your attention! :)
And to BChip: Thank you for your compliment! She's my sister's baby and a pure joy to me.