Google
English-Test.net
Find penpals and make new friends today!
 
cause; agent; broker; financier; money lender
factor
behalf
warranty
exchange
full quiz correct answer
 
Username
Password
 Remember me? 
Search   Album   FAQ   Memberlist   Profile   Private messages   Register   Log in 

seized vs captured



 
ESL/EFL Worksheets and Handouts for Students Printable, photocopiable, clearly structured
Designed for teachers and individual learners
For use in a classroom, at home, on your PC
ESL Forums | English Vocabulary, Grammar and Idioms
'A blue examination paper' vs 'An examination paper in blue color' | "Here is my two cents" vs "Here are my two cents"?
listening exercisestell a friend
Message
Author
seized vs captured #1 (permalink) Mon May 31, 2010 5:20 am   seized vs captured
 

hello everyone!
in the following sentence "in 1484 it was _______ by Richard III " what should i put - seized or captured?
thanks in advance.
Roman45
I'm new here and I like it ;-)


Joined: 09 Nov 2008
Posts: 21
Location: Moscow

seized vs captured #2 (permalink) Mon May 31, 2010 5:40 am   seized vs captured
 

What is 'it'?
_________________
Native English teacher at Mister Micawber's
Mister Micawber
Language Coach


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 13014

Learn some cool expressions in the following cool storyEnglish grammar exercises — improve your English knowledge and vocabulary skillsAre you a native speaker of English? Then you should read this!Read these English anecdotes and maybe smile today? Subscribe to free email English course
seized vs captured #3 (permalink) Mon May 31, 2010 5:59 am   seized vs captured
 

Possibly,

In 1484, Scarborough Castle was seized by Richard III.
Haihao
I'm a Communicator ;-)


Joined: 26 Oct 2006
Posts: 2471
Location: Japan

seized vs captured #4 (permalink) Mon May 31, 2010 6:01 am   seized vs captured
 

If it was defended militarily, then use 'captured'; if it was inhabited by non-combatants, then use 'seized'.
_________________
Native English teacher at Mister Micawber's
Mister Micawber
Language Coach


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 13014

seized vs captured #5 (permalink) Mon May 31, 2010 6:16 am   seized vs captured
 

I'd think it was the latter. Actually it was a move-in.
Haihao
I'm a Communicator ;-)


Joined: 26 Oct 2006
Posts: 2471
Location: Japan

seized vs captured #6 (permalink) Mon May 31, 2010 9:01 am   seized vs captured
 

It shouldn't be 'seized' or 'captured' as he didn't take the castle by force.

Richard III and his wife, Queen Ann, resided at the castle for a while, having been granted both the castle and the Lordship of Scarborough in September 1474. He stayed at the castle twice for short periods in 1484, Early in the year, he supervised the outfitting of his ships, and he later returned, to take charge of their rearming and revictualing.

Roman - you will give the wrong impression if you use 'seized' or 'captured' in that sentence, and I suggest you rewrite it. If that is not possible then you would need to write:
"in 1484 it was visited by Richard III."
for it to be historically accurate.
_________________
Cheers m' dears!
Beeesneees
Language Coach


Joined: 08 Apr 2010
Posts: 20428
Location: UK, born and bred

seized vs captured #7 (permalink) Mon May 31, 2010 9:06 am   seized vs captured
 

Exactly, BN. Actually I was first thinking "in 1484 it was inhabited by Richard III.", but I didn't have that choice.
Haihao
I'm a Communicator ;-)


Joined: 26 Oct 2006
Posts: 2471
Location: Japan

seized vs captured #8 (permalink) Mon May 31, 2010 9:08 am   seized vs captured
 

Ah, the dangers of lack of context...but do we know that's what Roman is referring to? Maybe 'it' means his broadsword or something.
_________________
Native English teacher at Mister Micawber's
Mister Micawber
Language Coach


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 13014

seized vs captured #9 (permalink) Mon May 31, 2010 9:14 am   seized vs captured
 

Then, "in YYYY it was X-ed by Richard III" is all possible.
Haihao
I'm a Communicator ;-)


Joined: 26 Oct 2006
Posts: 2471
Location: Japan

seized vs captured #10 (permalink) Mon May 31, 2010 16:47 pm   seized vs captured
 

Actually the whole sentence was "Only twice did Bodiam feature in serious conflict when in 1484 it was _______ by Richard III and in 1645 during the Civil War when attacked by the parliamentarian troops of Sir William Waller, which left it partially ruined". Now i see "captured" is the word
Roman45
I'm new here and I like it ;-)


Joined: 09 Nov 2008
Posts: 21
Location: Moscow

seized vs captured #11 (permalink) Mon May 31, 2010 17:36 pm   seized vs captured
 

That'll teach us lessons all round then.

It would be helpful if you were to post the context rather than a snippet - and we shouldn't second-guess you! :-)

Glad it's sorted.
_________________
Cheers m' dears!
Beeesneees
Language Coach


Joined: 08 Apr 2010
Posts: 20428
Location: UK, born and bred

Display posts from previous:   
'A blue examination paper' vs 'An examination paper in blue color' | "Here is my two cents" vs "Here are my two cents"?
ESL Forums | English Vocabulary, Grammar and Idioms All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1
Latest topics on ESL EFL Forums
How do you call this test?How are you?to be on time vs to be in timeplease check the sentences...Color or colors?The meaning of the phraseeach other or togethercan't help but v.s. can't helpPhrase: you called up that dayMeaning of "to roll over"Would you mind...?Don't tell any thing to herThe findings of...

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Subscribe to FREE email English course
First name E-mail