|
|
#2 (permalink) Mon Dec 12, 2005 20:02 pm Low cost vs less cost |
|
|
Less cost by itself is not used, although less costly is fine.
Some examples:
We are the low cost provider of IT services.
Our services are less costly than our competitors.
As you can see, less costly is used to compare things. Low cost is used all by itself.
Hope this helps,
-David |
|
Comenius You can meet me at english-test.net

Joined: 18 Nov 2005 Posts: 50 Location: San Francisco
|
|
#3 (permalink) Tue Dec 13, 2005 11:04 am Cost |
|
|
Hi Sunil,
Low cost is an adjective phrase as in: low cost energy, meaning energy which can be consumed cheaply.
Less cost is a comparative phrase as in: energy can be produced at less cost if you use wind/wave power, meaning that this type of energy costs less than other types of energy.
Alan _________________ English as a Second Language You can read my ESL story Present Simple |
|
Alan Co-founder

Joined: 27 Sep 2003 Posts: 13890 Location: UK
|
 |
#4 (permalink) Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:53 am Low cost vs less cost |
|
|
Good catch, Alan! I hadn't thought of using "less cost" as you mentioned, which is of course correct. Always good to have more than one set of eyes on things! :D
-David |
|
Comenius You can meet me at english-test.net

Joined: 18 Nov 2005 Posts: 50 Location: San Francisco
|
 |
|
| Aim to vs. aim at | Shall or should |