|
|
#2 (permalink) Mon Aug 09, 2010 16:38 pm Difference among 'lay off', 'sack', 'fire', 'dismiss', and 'make redundant'? |
|
|
"To lay off" means to terminate employment when the worker is not at fault. Usually, it is accompanied by severance pay, an arrangement sum of money to ease the blow. "To make redundant" is the same thing.
The next three, with respect to employment, mean the same thing. "Sack" is especially informal. "To fire" almost always indicates culpability. |
|
Mordant Language Coach
Joined: 12 May 2010 Posts: 1964 Location: United States
|
|
#3 (permalink) Mon Aug 09, 2010 16:38 pm Difference among 'lay off', 'sack', 'fire', 'dismiss', and 'make redundant'? |
|
|
Hi,
These are ways of removing someone from a job: 'sack', 'fire', 'dismiss'.
'Lay off' is to remove someone from a job for a limited period.
'Make redundant' is to remove someone from a job and also remove the job. Usually the redundant employee receives some kind of compensation - 'redundancy pay'.
Alan _________________ English as a Second Language You can read my ESL story Present Simple |
|
Alan Co-founder

Joined: 27 Sep 2003 Posts: 14461 Location: UK
|
 |
#4 (permalink) Mon Aug 09, 2010 16:42 pm Difference among 'lay off', 'sack', 'fire', 'dismiss', and 'make redundant'? |
|
|
| Alan, in the United States, a temporary layoff is usually called a furlough. The latter term is far more popular than the former now, probably to avoid the American connotation of "lay off." By itself, "layoff" is understood as permanent. |
|
Mordant Language Coach
Joined: 12 May 2010 Posts: 1964 Location: United States
|
 |
|
| I ordered a laptop on May 3, 2007, that arrived Friday, May 18. | Scene versus Sight |