Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more i

[Sarak]

thanks a lot kitos.I use your guidance a lot

No one can ever deny that human needs have changed throughout history. To put it more simply, they need diverse things as technology has improved, because the way of thinking has also changed. It is a matter of debate among psychologists whether all human needs should be addressed or not. There seems to be very little, if any, agreement about whether human should destroy lands or they should protect it for animals. While I wouldn't rule out the importance of human needs for their lives, I hold the view that protecting lands for animals has become more pressing than any other factors in the world.
To begin with, animals generally regarded as one of the most significant creatures which play an important role in human life. According to the latest figures, people's activities lead to a wide range of animal’s extinction over the past few decades. People have used animals for different purposes. They are the basis of human’s food, and people die from starvation without them. Moreover, people use them when they want to lift heavy burden and put them somewhere else. Consequently, people should be careful about the place which they want to build a house and industries.
Furthermore, when people destroy lands for housing and industries, they change the ecology of the place even if they don’t kill animals. To put the discussion in a wider context, consider a jungle which has been destroyed, so without trees, animals don’t have anything to eat, and it may contribute to animal’s extinction. Additionally, building factories and industrials set the stage for many environmental problems such as air pollution and water pollution. Needless to say, these changes increase the animal’s death in the course of time.
To sum up, it is very reasonable to fulfill human needs, but not as reasonable as saving animals. As a result, people should be cautious about animal’s lives.

TOEFL listening discussions: Why doesn't the young man want to assume the family business?

[Kitosdad]

thanks a lot kitos.I use your guidance a lot

No one can ever deny that human needs have changed throughout history. To put it more simply, they need diverse things SUCH as technology has improved, because the way of thinking has also changed. It is a matter of debate among psychologists whether all human needs should be addressed or not. There seems to be very little, if any, agreement about whether humanS should destroy land or they should protect it for animals. While I wouldn't rule out the importance of human needs for their lives, I hold the view that protecting land for animals has become more pressing than any other factors in the world.

To begin with, animals ARE generally regarded as one of the most significant creatures which play an important role in human life. According to the latest figures, people's activities HAVE lead to a wide range of animal extinction over the past few decades. People have used animals for different purposes. They are the basis of human’s food, and people die from starvation without them. Moreover, people use them when they want to lift A heavy burden and put IT somewhere else. Consequently, people should be careful about the place which they want to build a house and industries.
Furthermore, when people destroy lands TO PROVIDE housing and industries, they change the ecology of the place(,)even if they don’t kill animals. To put the discussion in a wider context, consider a jungle which has been destroyed, so without trees, animals don’t have anything to eat, and it may contribute to THOSE animals extinction. Additionally, building factories and industrials set the stage for many environmental problems such as air pollution and water pollution. Needless to say, these changes increase the animals deathS in the course of time.
To sum up, it is very reasonable to fulfill human needs, but not as reasonable as saving animals. As a result, people should be cautious about animal’s lives.
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
That was good Sarak.

Kitos. 8/10
_________________
Keep it simple ... Keep it interesting.