|
|
#2 (permalink) Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:22 am Difference between "have to" and "must" |
|
|
. Not much, Goran. Here is one representative discussion:
"Have to" and "must" have the same meaning in the affirmative and interrogative forms when referring to obligation. Some grammarians think that "must" is slightly stronger, but for all practical purposes, they mean the same thing:
Doctors have to attend medical school for several years before they can practice medicine.
Doctors must attend medical school for several years before they can practice medicine.
While "have to" and "must" can be used interchangeably, there are differences in usage, as Michael Swan observes in Practical English Usage (Oxford University Press, 1995):
Both verbs can be used in British English to talk about obligation. (In American English, 'have to' is the normal form.) British English often makes a distinction as follows. 'Must' is used mostly to talk about the feelings and wishes of the speaker and hearer — for example, to give or ask for orders. 'Have (got) to' is used mostly to talk about obligations that come from "outside" — for example from laws, regulations, agreements and other people's orders. Compare:
I must stop smoking. (I want to.) I have to stop smoking. Doctor's orders.
This is a terrible party. We really must go home. This is a lovely party, but we've got to go home because of the baby-sitter.
Must you wear dirty old jeans all the time? (Is it personally important for you?) Do you have to wear a tie at work? (Is there a regulation?) . _________________ Native English teacher at Mister Micawber's |
|
Mister Micawber Language Coach
Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 13015
|
|
#3 (permalink) Fri Feb 17, 2006 11:08 am Must |
|
|
Hi Goran,
You might like to know about another use of must, expressing the idea of likelihood or probably true as in:
Question: What is that sound I can hear? Answer; That must be the washing machine - it's always very noisy
Alan _________________ English as a Second Language You can read my ESL story Present Simple |
|
Alan Co-founder

Joined: 27 Sep 2003 Posts: 13887 Location: UK
|
 |
#4 (permalink) Sun Dec 17, 2006 12:53 pm Difference between "have to" and "must" |
|
|
Sorry, but up until I took this test I was with the idea that adapt and adjust always take reflexive pronouns with them.
1- Children usually adjust/ adapt themselves...
What would you say?
Tom |
|
Tom I'm a Communicator ;-)
Joined: 30 May 2006 Posts: 2103
|
 |
#5 (permalink) Sun Dec 17, 2006 12:55 pm Difference between "have to" and "must" |
|
|
No _________________ English as a Foreign Language You can read my EFL story Progressive Forms |
|
Alan Co-founder

Joined: 27 Sep 2003 Posts: 13887 Location: UK
|
 |
#6 (permalink) Sun Dec 17, 2006 12:59 pm Difference between "have to" and "must" |
|
|
Hi Tom
I'd say the test sentence is fine as it is and that adapt and adjust don't automatically need reflexive pronouns.
Amy _________________ "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power." ~ Abraham Lincoln |
|
Yankee I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 16 Apr 2006 Posts: 8316 Location: USA
|
 |
#7 (permalink) Wed May 11, 2011 11:14 am Difference between "have to" and "must" |
|
|
| what is the difference between "adapt" and "adjust?" |
|
Salibali I'm new here and I like it ;-)

Joined: 06 May 2011 Posts: 46 Location: Georgia
|
 |
|
| Meaning of 'implicit' | Is or is being? |