Google
English-Test.net
Find penpals and make new friends today!
 
protective coating
erasure
resist
absence
idea
full quiz correct answer
 
Username
Password
 Remember me? 
Search   Album   FAQ   Memberlist   Profile   Private messages   Register   Log in 

Which one is formal and which one is less formal?



 
ESL/EFL Worksheets and Handouts for Students Printable, photocopiable, clearly structured
Designed for teachers and individual learners
For use in a classroom, at home, on your PC
ESL Forums | English Vocabulary, Grammar and Idioms
Another Unit | "The film was spectacular which all the beautiful English landscape"?
listening exercisestell a friend
Message
Author
Which one is formal and which one is less formal? #1 (permalink) Sat Nov 13, 2010 23:31 pm   Which one is formal and which one is less formal?
 

Dear Tutors,

After a long break, I`m back to the forum to bother you with my questions :)

Which one is formal and which one is less formal below:

- Phil was laid off by the company.

- Paul was sacked for chewing gum in the kitchen.// Paul got sacked.....(either is correct, am I right?)

- Richard was made redundant.

- Sean was fired for being consistently late.

Warm Regards

Laszlo/Take_It_Easy
Take_It_Easy
I'm here quite often ;-)


Joined: 07 Oct 2009
Posts: 305

Which one is formal and which one is less formal? #2 (permalink) Sun Nov 14, 2010 0:32 am   Which one is formal and which one is less formal?
 

Which ones do you think, Laszlo?
_________________
Native English teacher at Mister Micawber's
Mister Micawber
Language Coach


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 13014

Learn to use the present simple with the help of this short storyEnglish grammar exercises — improve your English knowledge and vocabulary skillsAre you a native speaker of English? Then you should read this!Here is all you want to know about English! Click to subscribe to free email English course
Which one is formal and which one is less formal? #3 (permalink) Mon Nov 15, 2010 1:34 am   Which one is formal and which one is less formal?
 

To me, these sound very formal:

Phil was laid off by the company.

Richard was made redundant.

this is the most common to say, where I live:

Paul got sacked.

what do you think about the last one?
Take_It_Easy
I'm here quite often ;-)


Joined: 07 Oct 2009
Posts: 305

Which one is formal and which one is less formal? #4 (permalink) Mon Nov 15, 2010 4:23 am   Which one is formal and which one is less formal?
 

'Make redundant' (formal) = 'lay off' (informal)
'Sack' (casual) = 'discharge', 'terminate' (formal)
_________________
Native English teacher at Mister Micawber's
Mister Micawber
Language Coach


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 13014

Display posts from previous:   
Another Unit | "The film was spectacular which all the beautiful English landscape"?
ESL Forums | English Vocabulary, Grammar and Idioms All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1
Latest topics on ESL EFL Forums
at any given timeAccident and incident"to/With"There's some vs There are somebalm for a native speaker's ear or nonsense?scrambled egg.consistent implementationUnfortunately, sometimes my connection disconnected suddenlyOne of the most slippery grammar trippers...master chefhave (held or keep) at bay 3the placement of 'business-wise'could you tell me anything wrong on this sentence

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Subscribe to FREE email English course
First name E-mail