Prevent wild animals from dying out

[5|oVeCc]

Wild animals have no place in the 21st century. Some people think that preventing these wild animals from dying out is a waste of resource. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.

The rapid development of modern technology has seen a steady reduction in the variation of animals. Therefore, the issue of protecting wild creatures has been a subject of dispute for some time. Many argue that preventing animals from dying out is a waste of resource. However, my contention is that protecting wild animals would not spend too much resources and government should provide financial assistance to individuals who do so.

It has been argued that spending resources trying to prevent wild animals from becoming extinct is economically unreasonable. Our scarce resources, so this argument goes, should be spent on more proper areas instead of spending for protecting animals. It claims that people are well-advised to utilize resources maintaining the well-being of mankind and sustaining the development of society. However, animals really need our help and the process of saving them would not spend too much of our resources. In my opinion, what animals actually need only is a peaceful environment in which they can enjoy a stable life and breed. Obviously, this could be easily created by maintaining wild forest and decreasing industrial pollution to environment. Indeed, animals do not have luxurious materialistic requirements like human which need huge money to buy.

Another argument that against protecting wild animal is that we have to satisfy human need at first and then think about the issue of animal protection. It contents that our various resources, for example, land and qualified human resource, are becoming increasingly scarce. Only allocating them to improve the living quality of human is justifiable. However, animal protection is actually not a waste of resource. On the contrary, it helps us to make the best use of resources, which will be of the best interest of both human beings and animals. For one thing, we can establish zoos on spare land, which might generate more employment opportunities. For another, the variation of wild animals could be maintained in these zoos where many specialized animal trainers are recreated taking cares of them. In fact, researches into this issue show that a number of unemployed citizens would like to become a quailed animal protector.

To conclude, I firmly believe it is reasonable to make effort to prevent wild animals from dying out because it is actually not a waste of resource. In my opinion, if we continue with our past crimes against these creatures we will be remembered as cruel and inhuman by the generations of the future.

TOEFL listening lectures: What makes 'The Canterbury Tales' easier to understand?

[Kitosdad]