Google
English-Test.net
Find penpals and make new friends today!
 
ludicrous and complete failure; disaster
aristocracy
fathom
truculence
fiasco
full quiz correct answer
 
Username
Password
 Remember me? 
Search   Album   FAQ   Memberlist   Profile   Private messages   Register   Log in 

Integrated writing



 
TOEFL Practice tests Increase your TOEFL test score with
120 Vocabulary + 100 Grammar tests
600 TOEFL flashcards plus an ESL book
ESL Forum | Preparation for and help with the TOEFL® Test and essay samples collection
Most of us believe that it is important to protect the environment but few of us | Young people now enjoy their life better than the old generation
listening exercisestell a friend
Message
Author
Integrated writing #1 (permalink) Wed Jan 05, 2011 4:57 am   Integrated writing
 

Hi Sir, will you please check this for me, and tell me did I end up this task in the right way or not?
Reading

Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils, the petrified remains of ancient organisms, ever since the eighteenth century. In recent years, however, the sale of fossils, particularly of dinosaurs and other large vertebrate has grown into a big business. Rare and important fossils are now being sold to private owner ship for millions of dollars. This is an unfortunate development for both scientists and the general public.
The public suffers because fossils that would otherwise be donated to museums where everyone can see them are sold to private collectors who do not allow the public to view their collections. Making it harder for the public to see fossils can lead to a decline in public interest in fossils, which would be a pity.
More importantly, scientists are likely to lose access to some of the most important fossils and thereby miss out on potentially crucial discoveries about extinct life forms. Wealthy fossil buyers with a desire to own the rarest and most important fossils can spend virtually limitless amounts of money to acquire them. Scientists and the museums and universities they work for often cannot compete successfully for fossils against millionaire fossil buyers.
Moreover, commercial fossil collectors often destroy valuable scientific evidence associated with the fossil they unearth. Most commercial fossil collectors are untrained or uninterested in carrying out the careful field work and documentation that reveal the most about animal life in the past. For example, scientists have learned about the biology of nest-building dinosaurs called oviraptors by carefully observing the exact position of oviraptor fossils in the ground and the presence of other fossils in the immediate surroundings. Commercial fossil collectors typically pay no attention to how fossils lie in the ground or to the smaller fossils that may surround bigger ones.

Listening

Of course there are some negative consequences of selling fossils in the commercial market, but they’ve been greatly exaggerated. The benefits of commercial fossil trade greatly outweigh the disadvantages.
First of all, the public is likely to have greater exposure to fossils as a result of commercial fossil trade, not less exposure. Commercial fossil hunting makes a lot of fossils available for purchase. And as a result, even low-level public institutions, like public schools and libraries, cannot routinely by interesting fossils and display them for the public.
As for the idea that scientists will lose access to really important fossils, that’s not realistic, either. Before anyone can put value on a fossil, it needs to be scientifically identified, right? Well, the only people who can identify fossils, who can really tell what given fossil is or isn’t, are scientists. By performing detail examinations in tests on the fossils themselves. So even if a fossil’s destined to go to a private collector, it has to pass through the hands of scientific experts first. This way, the scientific community is not gonna miss out on anything important that’s out there.
Finally, whatever damage commercial fossil collectors sometimes do, if it weren’t for them, many fossils would simply go undiscovered, because there aren’t that many fossil collecting corporations that run by university and other scientific institutions. Isn’t it better for scientists to at least have more fossils being found, even if we don’t have all the scientific data we would like to have about their locations and surroundings than is it to have many fossils go completely undiscovered?

My Response
The reading passage and the professor talk about whether fossil business benefits scientists and the general public. The reading passage describes this as a negative impact, while the professor points out that it is a fortunate development. Both of them hold their opinions in the following way;

First of all, the reading passage states that the business of the fossils is flourishing these days. This remarkable success has enabled the businessmen to sell the rare species of the fossils to the private owners in high monetary value, which is not beneficial for both scientists and the general public. However, the professor holds different opinion by saying that it is merely an exaggeration to say that it has no concern with general public and scientists. According to him, the commercial trade of fossils enhances its purchase and availability to the schools and museums where they are displayed for the general public. Whereas the reading passage asserts that when private collectors buy these fossils, the public is deprived of viewing the fossil collection,which is pathetic.

Second, the reading passage claims that scientists are unable to achieve essential fossils for their research work and that's why many of the extinct life forms of various organisms remain under the veil.This is because the rich private owner tend to buy fossils and owe them as their property. On the contrary, the professor considers this as an unrealistic attitude of the author. He posits that only scientists are the personnels who can significantly provide the importance of fossils after their detailed examination. So how come the fossils can be handed to the private collectors first?

Third, the reading passage states that the private collectors are not well trained and are careless regarding handling of scientific evidence and documentation of the fossils. The author provides the example of oviraptor fossils which may be carried out in a better way by the scientists than private collectors. On the other hand, the professor goes against the author's opinion. He justifies his statement by saying that no matter what fossil damage is associated with private owners, it is better to have at least more fossils owned by the private collectors. He further raises a question that since there are a few scientists and institutions who collect these fossils, Isn't it better to have some fossils rather than leaving them unearthed?

TOEFL listening lectures: A university lecture by a professor of American History
_________________
Never give up trying, if you want to achieve something in life.
Babo
I'm here quite often ;-)


Joined: 11 Mar 2010
Posts: 473
Location: United states

Re: Integrated writing #2 (permalink) Wed Jan 05, 2011 10:33 am   Re: Integrated writing
 

Babo wrote:
Hi Sir, will you please check this for me, and tell me did I end up this task in the right way or not?
Reading

Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils, the petrified remains of ancient organisms, ever since the eighteenth century. In recent years, however, the sale of fossils, particularly of dinosaurs and other large vertebrate has grown into a big business. Rare and important fossils are now being sold to private ownerS for millions of dollars. This is an unfortunate development for both scientists and the general public.
The public suffers because fossils that would otherwise be donated to museums where everyone can see them are sold to private collectors who do not allow the public to view their collections. Making it harder for the public to see fossils can lead to a decline in public interest in fossils, which would be a pity.
More importantly, scientists are likely to lose access to some of the most important fossils and thereby miss out on potentially crucial discoveries about extinct life forms. Wealthy fossil buyers with a desire to own the rarest and most important fossils can spend virtually limitless amounts of money to acquire them. Scientists and the museums and universities they work for often cannot compete successfully for fossils against millionaire fossil buyers.
Moreover, commercial fossil collectors often destroy valuable scientific evidence associated with the fossil they unearth. Most commercial fossil collectors are untrained or uninterested in carrying out the careful field work and documentation that reveal the most about animal life in the past. For example, scientists have learned about the biology of nest-building dinosaurs called oviraptors by carefully observing the exact position of oviraptor fossils in the ground and the presence of other fossils in the immediate surroundings. Commercial fossil collectors typically pay no attention to how fossils lie in the ground or to the smaller fossils that may surround bigger ones.

Listening

Of course there are some negative consequences of selling fossils in the commercial market, but they’ve been greatly exaggerated. The benefits of commercial fossil trade greatly outweigh the disadvantages.
First of all, the public is likely to have greater exposure to fossils as a result of commercial fossil trade, not less exposure. Commercial fossil hunting makes a lot of fossils available for purchase. And a As a result, even low-level public institutions, like public schools and libraries, cannot routinely bUy interesting fossils and display them TO the public.
As for the idea that scientists will lose access to really important fossils, that’s not realistic, either. Before anyone can put A value on a fossil, it needs to be scientifically identified. Well, the only people who can identify fossils, who can really tell what A given fossil is or isn’t, are scientists WHO perform detail examinations in tests on the fossils themselves. So even if a fossil’s destined to go to a private collector, it has to pass through the hands of scientific experts first. This way, the scientific community is not gonna GOING TO miss out on anything important that’s out there.

Finally, whatever damage commercial fossil collectors sometimes do, if it weren’t for them, many fossils would simply go undiscovered, because there aren’t that many fossil collecting corporations that ARE run by universitIES and other scientific institutions. Isn’t it better for scientists to at least have more fossils being found, even if we don’t have all the scientific data we would like to have about their locations and surroundings, than is it to have many fossils go completely undiscovered?
.............................................................................................................................
My Response
The reading passage and the professor talk about whether fossil business benefits scientists and the general public. The reading passage describes this as a negative impact, while the professor points out that it is a fortunate development. Both of them hold their opinions in the following way;

First of all, the reading passage states that the business of the fossils is flourishing these days. This remarkable success has enabled the businessmen to sell the rare species of the fossils to the private owners in high monetary value, which is not beneficial for both scientists and the general public. However, the professor holds different opinion by saying that it is merely an exaggeration to say that it has no concern with general public and scientists. According to him, the commercial trade of fossils enhances its purchase and availability to the schools and museums, where they are displayed TO the general public. Whereas the reading passage asserts that when private collectors buy these fossils, the public is deprived of viewing the fossil collection, which is pathetic.

Second, the reading passage claims that scientists are unable to achieve essential fossils for their research work and that's why many of the extinct life forms of various organisms remain under the veil.This is because the rich private ownerS tend to buy fossils and owe them as their property. On the contrary, the professor considers this as an unrealistic attitude of the author. He posits that only scientists are the personnels who can significantly provide the importance of fossils after their detailed examination. So how come the fossils can be handed to the private collectors first?

Third, the reading passage states that the private collectors are not well trained and are careless regarding handling of scientific evidence and documentation of the fossils. The author provides the example of oviraptor fossils which may be carried out in a better way by the scientists than private collectors. On the other hand, the professor goes against the author's opinion. He justifies his statement by saying that no matter what fossil damage is associated with private owners, it is better to have at least more fossils owned by the private collectors. He further raises a question that since there are a few scientists and institutions who collect these fossils, Isn't it better to have some fossils rather than leaving them unearthed?
.............................................................................................................................
Very interesting. You write well.

Kitos. 9/10

TOEFL listening lectures: A university lecture by a professor of American History

_________________
Keep it simple ... Keep it interesting.
Kitosdad
Language Coach


Joined: 04 Mar 2009
Posts: 13417
Location: ESSEN, Germany, (but English.)

TOEFL Prep Tests — Increase your Score with 120 free TOEFL Vocabulary TestsTOEFL Study Guide Guaranteed to Raise TOEFL scores without weeks and months of studying — View the Free ReportTOEFL Test Package — Learn the most difficult TOEFL vocabulary words you need to pass the TOEFL with these vocabulary tests and this unique flash card systemHere is how you can learn English the fun way! Click to subscribe to free email English course
Integrated writing #3 (permalink) Wed Jan 05, 2011 21:42 pm   Integrated writing
 

Thanks a lot Sir. It is really an honor for me to snatch 9/10 from you. This is second time I got 9 since I joined this forum:)
_________________
Never give up trying, if you want to achieve something in life.
Babo
I'm here quite often ;-)


Joined: 11 Mar 2010
Posts: 473
Location: United states

Integrated writing #4 (permalink) Wed Jan 05, 2011 21:52 pm   Integrated writing
 

You only get what you deserve Babo. I don't play favourites. Well done.
_________________
Keep it simple ... Keep it interesting.
Kitosdad
Language Coach


Joined: 04 Mar 2009
Posts: 13417
Location: ESSEN, Germany, (but English.)

Integrated writing #5 (permalink) Fri Jan 07, 2011 3:48 am   Integrated writing
 

Thank you Sir.
_________________
Never give up trying, if you want to achieve something in life.
Babo
I'm here quite often ;-)


Joined: 11 Mar 2010
Posts: 473
Location: United states

Display posts from previous:   
Most of us believe that it is important to protect the environment but few of us | Young people now enjoy their life better than the old generation
ESL Forum | Preparation for and help with the TOEFL® Test and essay samples collection All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1
Latest topics on TOEFL Test Forums
Management information technologyyoung people enjoy life more than olderNO ESSAY ONLY A QUESTIONThe best way for governments to control energy conservation is to increase the prIt is often not a good thing to move to a new city or a new countryDo you agree or disgree with the following statement? A person should never makeCompare the contributions of artists to society with that of scientistsIt is only worth watching movies that can teach us something about real lifeNowadays radio is being replaced TV and the Internet. To what extent do you agreeWould you like to be a fashion model if you were offered the opportunity?Businesses should do anything they can do to make profitwork for a large company or a small companyCourse grades are based solely on exams or based more on class participation ?

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Subscribe to FREE email English course
First name E-mail