|
|
 #2 (permalink) Thu Mar 10, 2011 19:55 pm Please check this sentence |
|
|
One possiility:
With regard to chicken, consumption increased dramatically between 1979 and 1994, rising from just under 150g to 225g. It continued to increase, though less significantly, over the next decade, reaching a peak of 250g in 2002.
I think you need to qualify the measures more. 150g per who/what over what period? Possibly the wider context makes it clear, but when I look at that I imagine 150grammes of chicken per person per meal which doesn't emtirely make sense.
_________________
Cheers m' dears! |
|
Beeesneees
Language Coach
Joined: 08 Apr 2010
Posts: 20463
Location: UK, born and bred
|
|
| #3 (permalink) Fri Mar 11, 2011 17:33 pm Please check this sentence |
|
|
Hi Beeesneees,
Thank you so much for your useful advice. And yes, you are right, I am talking about the consumption of chicken in grams per person per week.
Have a good weekend.
Kind regards, Anh |
|
 Danganh
I'm new here and I like it ;-)
Joined: 27 Jul 2010
Posts: 43
Location: Hanoi, Vietnam
|
 |
| #4 (permalink) Fri Mar 11, 2011 17:47 pm www.english-test.net ID FP 71 KU 57 58 93 07 71 NP |
|
|
| http://www.english-test.net/ DH ** 15 77 ** 89 RE 74 ** 62 UE 09 ** LR WG ** 81 LA 83 95 ** PE KT JP EY ** NA KD ** ** ** ** |
|
Embamcongom
New Member
Joined: 01 Mar 2011
Posts: 2
|
|
| #5 (permalink) Fri Mar 11, 2011 18:30 pm Please check this sentence |
|
|
| Danganh wrote: |
Hi Beeesneees,
Thank you so much for your useful advice. And yes, you are right, I am talking about the consumption of chicken in grams per person per week.
Have a good weekend.
Kind regards, Anh |
Hi,
In that case you could clarify your sentence like this:
With regard to chicken, consumption increased dramatically between 1979 and 1994, rising from just under 150g per person per week to 225g. It continued to increase, though less significantly, over the next decade, reaching a peak of 250g per person per week in 2002.
_________________
Cheers m' dears! |
|
Beeesneees
Language Coach
Joined: 08 Apr 2010
Posts: 20463
Location: UK, born and bred
|
|
| #6 (permalink) Fri Mar 11, 2011 18:31 pm Re: www.english-test.net ID FP 71 KU 57 58 93 07 71 NP |
|
|
| Embamcongom wrote: |
| http://www.english-test.net/ DH ** 15 77 ** 89 RE 74 ** 62 UE 09 ** LR WG ** 81 LA 83 95 ** PE KT JP EY ** NA KD ** ** ** ** |
Hello mbamcongom,
Can you explain your 'code' please?
You have posted a similar list twice now. Are we supposed to understand it?
_________________
Cheers m' dears! |
|
Beeesneees
Language Coach
Joined: 08 Apr 2010
Posts: 20463
Location: UK, born and bred
|
|
| #7 (permalink) Sat Mar 12, 2011 7:36 am Re: www.english-test.net ID FP 71 KU 57 58 93 07 71 NP |
|
|
| Beeesneees wrote: |
| You have posted a similar list twice now. Are we supposed to understand it? |
I hope it's not some encrypted spam, understood only by those in the know. Hehe. =)
_________________
If it's not easy, don't do it!
That's how I got where I am. |
|
Our Tort System
I'm a Communicator ;-)
Joined: 24 May 2010
Posts: 2850
Location: The big apple
|
|
| #8 (permalink) Sat Mar 12, 2011 11:28 am Please check this sentence |
|
|
The thought has crossed my mind that he might be giving pirated serial numbers. I don't wish to delete the posts without giving him a chance to explain, but I have formed a cunning plan.
_________________
Cheers m' dears! |
|
Beeesneees
Language Coach
Joined: 08 Apr 2010
Posts: 20463
Location: UK, born and bred
|
|
|
| a month before | Please answer my question on English grammar |
