A/D People would be happier if they had fewer possessions

[Shmily94771]

A/D People would be happier if they had fewer possessions

How much wealthy you have make you happy? The question make most people confusing, suggesting that there is no universal answer among people because the definition referring to the happy is complex philosophic one. Someone insists that more wealth he has, more pleasure he will be, while on the other hand, a large number of people envision that having not extraordinary money is, alternatively, a gift for them, reasoning from the philosophy that being wealthy is always the orientation of the troublesome. As far as I concerned, property belong to individual is precious, indispensible and even necessary. I would like to state the reason why having fewer assets is insensible in the following perspectives.
The primary reason that who having fewer possessions trend to be immediately access to the dilemma is they ignore the basic principle that ensuring the ordinary life, safety, and subsequent development is a fundamental human requirement. In other word, the money is necessary to pay for your ordinary life. Taking extremely examples, if the tuition could not be applied, children would definitely confront the difficult to be not enrolled by the university; if the payment of durg and being curing could not be in the count of hospital, the person who you love could not be promptly remedied because of deficiency of mechanical service and drug. In this time, no one can be happy to deal with these torments. Consequently, scarce property is not good idea to the person who wants to be pursuing better future.
In addition, there is no only definition to refer to the property. It means that property have the broad definition and narrow definition. According the broad definition of possession, large number characteristics, such as honesty, knowledgeable, loyalty, can be respected as individual precious assets, which, as invisible property, play an essential role in the way to be successful man. A good case in the point is Lincoln, not a wealth person, who was successful to be elected to be one of greatest president of American United States in history, as result of his respected characteristic, including loyalty to his ethics, accessibility to the black people, who generally were regarded as inferior people. The example is best evidence that the invisible property has tremendous value, and giant power. No one are willing to complain this property is so much that would make them in trouble, on contrast, senses of happiness, as well as achievement, confident will definitely award from these precious assets.
To sum up, be happy is an act, and wealth is the employment to be pleasure. I can safely come to the conclusion that importance of possession to be a successful man and live in harmony is crucial.

TOEFL listening lectures: A lecture from a social sciences class (3)