| Liberal parenting Vs Conservative parenting | the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. review please |
Message |
Author |
#1 (permalink) Mon May 02, 2011 8:03 am Many countries have spent vast sums of money on armament |
|
|
Please, help me with some advice. Topic Many countries have spent vast sums of money on armament for the sake of self defense. Some people think the government should stop putting money in this field. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Although it is an era of world peace, local military conflicts exist for many causes such as territory or natural resources. For this reason, countries should develop national defense with a certain amount of money. Therefore, the trade off is the key to avoid arms race.
It is reasonable to develop national defense appropriately. First of all, a strong national defense can prevent invasion and occupation. It means the military power is the base of national security. Second, to develop national defense, the government must promote the national defense industry, which can accelerate the advancement in technology. In addition, these technology can be converted to civil use such as CDMA, which can benefit the society as a whole. Thirdly, the army can make sure our business benefits. For instance, Many countries have sent warships to protect cargo ships.
Despite the fact, the government should not allocate too much money on armament, which often leads to disasters. For example, Cord War has made the two countries ( The Union Soviet and The United States ) produce a enormous amount of weapons such as nuclear bombs. As a result, these weapons became the greatest threat to human survival. Even now, Cold War has come to the end, people have to face the problem how to dispose of these weapons without any trouble. But as we known, many weapons such as AK-47 and RPG have been largely sold to African countries. This crucial factor has led to civil wars and resulted in the death of millions of innocent civilians.
In conclusion, national defense is necessary but the purpose is to preserve peace. For this aim, countries should build up mutual trust to avoid arms race. More importantly, weapon selling should be restricted limited.
TOEFL listening lectures: A university lecture by a professor in the College of Fine Arts |
|
Wangboniu I'm new here and I like it ;-)
Joined: 20 Apr 2011 Posts: 39 Location: Beijing, born and bred
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) Mon May 02, 2011 11:54 am Many countries have spent vast sums of money on armament |
|
|
Although it is an era of world peace, local military conflicts exist for many causes such as territory or natural resources. For this reason, countries should develop national defense with a certain amount of money. Therefore, the trade off is the key to avoid arms race.
It is reasonable to develop national defense appropriately. First of all, a strong national defense can prevent invasion and occupation. It means the military power is the base of national security.
Second, to develop national defense, the government must promote the national defense industry, which can accelerate the advancement in technology. In addition, these technology can be converted to civil use such as CDMA, which can benefit the society as a whole. Thirdly, the army can make sure our business benefits. For instance, many countries have sent warships to protect cargo ships.
Despite the fact, the government should not allocate too much money on armament, which often leads to disasters. For example, CoLd War has made the two countries ( The Union Soviet and The United States ) produce a enormous amount of weapons such as nuclear bombs. As a result, these weapons became the greatest threat to human survival. Even now, Cold War has come to the end, people have to face the problem how to dispose of these weapons without any trouble. But as we known, many weapons such as AK-47 and RPG have been largely sold to African countries. This crucial factor has led to civil wars and resulted in the death of millions of innocent civilians.
In conclusion, national defense is necessary but the purpose is to preserve peace. For this aim, countries should build up mutual trust to avoid arms race. More importantly, weapon selling should be restricted limited.
I AGREE WITH YOU:) _________________ Just a confused kid... trying to live through twists & turns of life!
------
Everything Is Temporary! |
|
Katty2010 I'm here quite often ;-)

Joined: 16 Apr 2010 Posts: 964 Location: GaintPeach
|
|
#3 (permalink) Mon May 02, 2011 12:59 pm Many countries have spent vast sums of money on armament |
|
|
Hi, Katty2010
Thanks your response, can u give me some more specific advice or help me correct some mistakes, which are the things I really need. That would be great! Thank you.
Wangboniu |
|
Wangboniu I'm new here and I like it ;-)
Joined: 20 Apr 2011 Posts: 39 Location: Beijing, born and bred
|
 |
#4 (permalink) Mon May 02, 2011 19:50 pm Re: Many countries have spent vast sums of money on armament |
|
|
Hi, I have made a few suggestions for your essay
| Wangboniu wrote: |
Please, help me with some advice. Topic Many countries have spent vast sums of money on armament for the sake of self defense. Some people think the government should stop putting money in this field. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Although it is an[some consider this an] era of world peace{I think your original statement is too strong}, local military conflicts [still] exist for many [due to] causes such as territory [disputes] or natural resources [conficts]. For this reason, countries should develop national defense with a certain amount of money. Therefore, the trade off is the key to avoid arms race.{These last two sentences are awkward- try "For this reason, countries should devote some resources towards the development of a strong national defense while still trying to avoid any type of arms race"}
It is reasonable to develop national defense appropriately. First of all, a strong national defense can prevent invasion and occupation. It means the military power is the base of national security. Second, to develop national defense, the government must promote the national defense industry, which can accelerate the advancement{s} in technology. In addition, these technology can be converted to civil use such as CDMA,{write out unfamiliar acronyms the first time you use them} which can benefit the society as a whole. Thirdly, the army can make sure our business benefits. For instance, Many countries have sent warships to protect cargo ships.
Despite the fact[these facts], the government should not allocate too much money on armament{s}, which often leads to disasters. For example, [The] Cord[Cold] War has made the two countries ( The Union Soviet and The United States ){use commas instead of () } produce a enormous amount of weapons such as nuclear bombs. As a result, these weapons became the greatest threat to human survival. Even now,[that the] Cold War has come to the end, people have to face the problem how to dispose of these weapons without any trouble. But as we known,[know] many weapons such as [the] AK-47 and RPG{s} have been largely sold to African countries. This crucial factor has led to civil wars and resulted in the death of millions of innocent civilians.
In conclusion, national defense is necessary but the [its] purpose is to preserve peace. For this aim, countries should build up mutual trust to avoid [an] arms race. More importantly, weapon selling {"selling weapons" or "the sale of weapons" }should be restricted limited.{restricted and limited mean the same here - do you mean "greatly restricted"?}
TOEFL listening lectures: A university lecture by a professor in the College of Fine Arts |
|
|
Luschen I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 08 Apr 2011 Posts: 2132 Location: Nashville TN, USA
|
 |
#5 (permalink) Tue May 03, 2011 9:54 am Re: Many countries have spent vast sums of money on armament |
|
|
Hi! Luschen
Thanks your suggestions! It does help me a lot. I begin finding the interests of writing.
I have one questions to ask you. How do you remember words? Do you learn them by syllables? I find this way can help me pronounce more accurately and remember them more quickly.
Wangboniu |
|
Wangboniu I'm new here and I like it ;-)
Joined: 20 Apr 2011 Posts: 39 Location: Beijing, born and bred
|
 |
#6 (permalink) Tue May 03, 2011 13:02 pm Re: Many countries have spent vast sums of money on armament |
|
|
| Hi, I am a native English speaker, so maybe for me it is easier to remember new words. Often I can compare them to a word I already know. I do think that reading is critical to building one's vocabulary. I read all the time. |
|
Luschen I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 08 Apr 2011 Posts: 2132 Location: Nashville TN, USA
|
 |
|
| Liberal parenting Vs Conservative parenting | the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. review please |