Why wasn't Jim Washington interviewed for the story?

[Saneta]

http://www.english-test.net/toeic/listening/where_will_the_convention_be_held_this_year.html

please explain in bold:
Why wasn't Jim Washington interviewed for the story?

many thanks

[Beeesneees]

Which part?
There's nothing strange or idiomatic there.
_________________
Cheers m' dears!

[Saneta]

Does it mean that Jim had played in the story and was interviewed as a famous person who had acted in this play ot had an interview which was conducted by someone from mass media?
interviewed for the story= interviewed in the matter of the story someone had played?

[Beeesneees]

The 'story' (newspaper article) was being written by the interviewer who is a reporter.
Someone is asking him why Jim wasn't interviewed.

We can assume that Jim was involved in this event, whatever it might have been. (It isn't necessarily a play).
_________________
Cheers m' dears!

[Saneta]

my minor question, is it correct, we say:
interviewed for the story - someone
but
an/the interview to the story?

thanks

[Beeesneees]

I would use 'for' or 'of' in both those phrases, but it's difficult to see what you mean from just a small phrase. Could you give an example?
_________________
Cheers m' dears!

[Saneta]

ok, for example:
I was interviewd for the story.
but
I had an interview to the story.
What do you think?
thanx

[Beeesneees]

I don't understand what you are trying to get at by saying 'I had an interview to the story'.
_________________
Cheers m' dears!

[Saneta]

'I had an interview to the story'->I mean: A reporter interviewed me to put the info from me in the story. - What do you think?
Maybe should I say: 'I had an interview for the story'?

[Beeesneees]

That would be 'for the story ' or 'about the incident/occasion on which the story was based'.
_________________
Cheers m' dears!