Google
English-Test.net
Find penpals and make new friends today!
 
to move backward; to go back; to return to a previous condition
compartmentalize
speed
catalog
regress
full quiz correct answer
 
Username
Password
 Remember me? 
Search   Album   FAQ   Memberlist   Profile   Private messages   Register   Log in 

Past: He doesn't know how the game is supposed to be played



 
ESL/EFL Worksheets and Handouts for Students Printable, photocopiable, clearly structured
Designed for teachers and individual learners
For use in a classroom, at home, on your PC
ESL Forum | English Vocabulary, Grammar and Idioms
Please explain to me "unless" and "if" | Subject/object: The shooting of the rebels caused a lot...
listening exercisestell a friend
Message
Author
Past: He doesn't know how the game is supposed to be played #1 (permalink) Mon Apr 24, 2006 20:29 pm   Past: He doesn't know how the game is supposed to be played
 

-He doesn't know how the game is supposed to be played.

1-What are you talking about? He has won two gold medals.
2-What are you talking about? He won two gold medals.
(He won them at an unspecified time in the past. Perhaps the speaker himself doesn't know when he won them.)

Are both sentences 1 and 2 acceptable replies to the first sentence?
Is there any difference in their meanings?
Navi
I'm here quite often ;-)


Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 271

Past #2 (permalink) Mon Apr 24, 2006 20:39 pm   Past
 

Both sentences have the same meaning, but the tense normally used for an unstated time in the past is the present perfect. Thus, the correct sentence is the first one:

1-What are you talking about? He has won two gold medals.
Conchita
Language Coach


Joined: 26 Dec 2005
Posts: 2826
Location: Madrid, Spain

Learn all about English adverbs in this amusing storyEnglish grammar exercises — improve your English knowledge and vocabulary skillsAre you a native speaker of English? Then you should read this!Here is all you want to know about English! Click to subscribe to free email English course
Past tense #3 (permalink) Mon Apr 24, 2006 22:26 pm   Past tense
 

Hi navi,

You asked whether these two were acceptable:

Quote:
He doesn't know how the game is supposed to be played.

1-What are you talking about? He has won two gold medals.
2-What are you talking about? He won two gold medals.
(He won them at an unspecified time in the past. Perhaps the speaker himself doesn't know when he won them.)

Are both sentences 1 and 2 acceptable replies to the first sentence?
Is there any difference in their meanings?



In a sense they are both acceptable. The past simple in number 2 is acceptable because we don't know about what happened previously in the conversation and to my mind it suggests that reference has already been made to a game in the past.

Alan
_________________
English as a Second Language
You can read my ESL story Present Simple
Alan
Co-founder
Alan Townend

Joined: 27 Sep 2003
Posts: 13887
Location: UK

Display posts from previous:   
Please explain to me "unless" and "if" | Subject/object: The shooting of the rebels caused a lot...
ESL Forum | English Vocabulary, Grammar and Idioms All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1
Latest topics on English Forums
The place of the adjectives: It's a TINY RED WOODEN houseI want to change this: He has success and happinessWhat does it fee like? vs. How does it feel?"WAGES" AND "AT LAST"Important, Essential and CrucialCan I use "as" like " be known as = be famousMeaning of constituteShe speaks EnglishMeaning of PLAYPARKWhile: I mentioned that while we were eating lunchWhen/while: Go get your things when we are having lunchQUESTION TAGS: You are telling lies. Isn't it true?Ten minutes of ten

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Subscribe to FREE email English course
First name E-mail