Is censorship sometimes necessary?

[Mr. Kyaw Min Lwin]

Yes, it is needed. Regardless of politics, culture, religion and etc.,. Every human actions need controls from time to time for the peaceful betterment of the society. For instance, pissing , swearing and spitting in the public, or a pop star unnecessarily yelling F words and inappropriately showing his indecent parts on the stage of a concert is not democracy. Reversely, they will only devalue the virtue of democracy.

We need to make a universal reasoning without prejudice, religion, nationality, custom and culture and so on to make it fair and just. Otherwise, it is only a biased, clouded reasoning only.

And no educated people would appreciate it. Because, it is useless and unbeneficial.

One more example, would any parents encourage a teenage daughter sunbathing naked in the broad day light?

Maybe it gives them million bucks, or send them to the whatever heaven. And even maybe not?

regards.

kyaw.

[Minhajquazi]

Terrible!

It seems some fanatic people are preaching us!

Thank you Mr. Lwin for appeasing a few!

Without proper knowledge, I never dare to tease any religion. We forget beside my surroundings are all not dynamic and very knowledgeable peers.

This forum is not and no forums are liable free from abusing talking against any religion or its preacher/s, I am afraid those who like to say so.

It is shame.

We everybody should talk with much accountability that is now seemingly absent here
_________________
Quazi,(46) a writer, thinker & humanist
since 28 years.

[Minhajquazi]

Ignorance of law and ignorance of knowledge-both have just no excuse!

We realized why do we sometime need censorship explicitly.
_________________
Quazi,(46) a writer, thinker & humanist
since 28 years.

[Lmn_Dreem]

I apologize if I caused fanatic problem in this forum..

[Minhajquazi]

Sorry, you didn't do-Mr. E. Dreem

When a quarter educated one reads a printed book, he always feels it is a sacred one.

Because, he has no idea what is called authenticity or standard of that book.These ways many people grasp the misinformation or be misinformed.

If that man had just few basic good ideas what lied he says about our true Mohammed(SM), he never would have said these ways. Same, I never dare to say these ways against the Jesus Christ or other great one. These are one of the American's drawbacks which liability ultimately goes on the millions good and better educated persons' shoulder.

There are a lot of ways to differ with somebody, but this type of delivery just seems illiteracy.

When you can write English with good grammar as a native Englishman, it doesn't represent, you are an well Educated and Gentleman. Because educated persons have that sense in what is 'core beliefs' that we must shun away from danger of ignition. Where basic social and state law say this-it is just crime in every where in the world including the USA.

Present ruler in the K.S.A is not the reflection of the true Islam or Mohammad (S.M.), and neither Europeans are the true indigenous in America.

Albert Einstein once said - Science without religion is lame, but religion without science is just blind. Islam is one of the modern sciences. To grasp it, one must read its inner side. Terror, a man of Guile and Fanatic persons have no religion except ignorance
_________________
Quazi,(46) a writer, thinker & humanist
since 28 years.

[Torsten]

[Lmn_Dreem]

In my opinion, yes we can teach people rules of human behaviour through censorship under some conditions. In any system in the world you are applying conditions and censoring that system then you study initial results then you'll decide if it's fine or you should change the conditions and censor your system... etc. That standerds is applied on every system in the world. Censorship is a complicated concept. There is no any system all over the world doesn't not use censorship even it's democratic or whatever. The differences are in level and method of the censorship. In my opinion there is no any country doesn't use any rule of censorship.

[Mr. Kyaw Min Lwin]

I think civilizations of mankind came into existence well before democracy.
Laws > rules and regulations > standards > directives > censorships, they are all involved in Controlling, one of the main functions of management. I understand.

So censorship is one of the controlling methods of whichever ism or policy, I assume. And there are no perfect methods and systems for mankind. So we evolve.

For example, our ears used to turn and move around almost 180 degree like a deer does.

kind regards.