Google
English-Test.net
Find penpals and make new friends today!
 
introduction; foreword; opening statement
undercut
preface
revise
investment
full quiz correct answer
 
Username
Password
 Remember me? 
Search   Album   FAQ   Memberlist   Profile   Private messages   Register   Log in 

There can only be... or there can be only...



 
ESL/EFL Worksheets and Handouts for Students Printable, photocopiable, clearly structured
Designed for teachers and individual learners
For use in a classroom, at home, on your PC
ESL Forums | English Vocabulary, Grammar and Idioms
"Long for" and "short in" how to use them? | it is crucial
listening exercisestell a friend
Message
Author
There can only be... or there can be only... #1 (permalink) Mon Feb 06, 2012 23:38 pm   There can only be... or there can be only...
 

Hi everyone,

Is there a difference in meaning between the two following sentences? If so, which one is more acceptable in BrE?

- There can be only one rooster in the hen house. (heard it from Jack Nicholson)

or:

- There can only be one rooster in the hen house.

By the way: 'can' is a modal auxilary, what about 'be', can it be used as a modal too?

Thanks
Alexandro.
_________________
'Everyone can mistakes! After all, nobody's perfect.'
Alexandro
I'm here quite often ;-)


Joined: 10 Jul 2010
Posts: 784

There can only be... or there can be only... #2 (permalink) Tue Feb 07, 2012 1:02 am   There can only be... or there can be only...
 

No difference in meaning.

I'm sure that you already know that the modal verbs are can, could, may, might, shall, should, will and would.
_________________
Cheers m' dears!
Beeesneees
Language Coach


Joined: 08 Apr 2010
Posts: 20465
Location: UK, born and bred

Learn some cool expressions in the following cool storyEnglish grammar exercises — improve your English knowledge and vocabulary skillsAre you a native speaker of English? Then you should read this!How many different ways with words do you know? Subscribe to free email English course
There can only be... or there can be only... #3 (permalink) Tue Feb 07, 2012 1:32 am   There can only be... or there can be only...
 

Yes, I do and again, thank you for your reply. So, I take it 'be' is a copular verb, right?

Alexandro
_________________
'Everyone can mistakes! After all, nobody's perfect.'
Alexandro
I'm here quite often ;-)


Joined: 10 Jul 2010
Posts: 784

There can only be... or there can be only... #4 (permalink) Tue Feb 07, 2012 2:23 am   There can only be... or there can be only...
 

Again, I believe you already know that and fail to see why you are asking.
_________________
Cheers m' dears!
Beeesneees
Language Coach


Joined: 08 Apr 2010
Posts: 20465
Location: UK, born and bred

Display posts from previous:   
"Long for" and "short in" how to use them? | it is crucial
ESL Forums | English Vocabulary, Grammar and Idioms All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1
Latest topics on ESL EFL Forums
definition of sexual intercourseIs this sentence correct?the more..., the moremeaning of "pitch for"Are these sentences correct?Don't you get any ideas or Don't get any ideas.cue fanfaretallblue persuasionleaving little else by waycrosswordsPlease correct my letter of applicationHow to ask the newsagent for a pack of smokes.

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Subscribe to FREE email English course
First name E-mail