|
|
#2 (permalink) Tue Feb 07, 2012 13:40 pm segment vs cluster |
|
|
| Both seem feasible to me, provided that the words "segment" and "cluster" can naturally be applied to the things in question. To me, "segment into clusters" implies that the things are initially in a compact group and are being separated into a number of smaller groups. "cluster into segments" implies that the things are initially widely spread, or ungrouped, and are being brought together into a number of groups. Depending on context, there may be other, more natural ways of saying this. |
|
Dozy I'm a Communicator ;-)
Joined: 17 Jun 2011 Posts: 3315 Location: UK
|
|
#3 (permalink) Thu Feb 09, 2012 0:09 am segment vs cluster |
|
|
Thank you very much. Roughly speaking, the context was as follows - objects need to be divided into groups based on the proximity relation, so that objects that are 'close' to each other are classified into the same collection. |
|
Rabid Bear New Member
Joined: 01 Feb 2012 Posts: 5
|
 |
#4 (permalink) Thu Feb 09, 2012 0:42 am segment vs cluster |
|
|
| In that case, I would go with "segment smth into clusters" , but I could see how the opposite phrase would make sense too. |
|
Luschen I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 08 Apr 2011 Posts: 2135 Location: Nashville TN, USA
|
 |
#5 (permalink) Thu Feb 09, 2012 10:56 am segment vs cluster |
|
|
| Thank you very much. Actually, I was also inclining towards this form. |
|
Rabid Bear New Member
Joined: 01 Feb 2012 Posts: 5
|
 |
#6 (permalink) Sat Feb 11, 2012 10:47 am segment vs cluster |
|
|
I would rather say
Make this into clusters. Cluster this. |
|
E2e4 I'm a Communicator ;-)
Joined: 01 Jan 2011 Posts: 1229
|
 |
|
| An interesting notice! | take something for granted |