|
|
#2 (permalink) Tue Jun 13, 2006 2:37 am Comma could be used before that or that's: why? |
|
|
In English we normally don't use a comma before "that" when it is joining two clauses. Of course, if you have a series of subordinate clauses, the commas will start before the second in the series.
Anyway, the sentence you gave is punctuated incorrectly, and that comma should not be there. |
|
Jamie (K) I'm a Communicator ;-)
Joined: 24 Feb 2006 Posts: 5332 Location: Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
|
#3 (permalink) Tue Jun 13, 2006 3:43 am Comma could be used before that or that's: why? |
|
|
| Tom wrote: |
Hello everybody
I was just wondering if a comma could be used before that or that's why . Is the given sentence correct keeping the comma in mind?
1- The real problem is that, I hardly know any people in that city.
I need a few examples of the same, please.
Thanks
Tom |
When it comes to relative clauses, you know there are two kinds: defining and no-defining RCs.
You should not use commas in DRC Have you got the money (that) I lent you yesterday? I saw the man who wants to buy our car.
You should place the NDRC between commas or after a comma if it goes at the end of the sentence. Peter, who I had seen earlier, wasn?t at the party. I have two sisters, who are living in New York at the moment.
Hope it helps
Tere |
|
Tere I'm new here and I like it ;-)

Joined: 08 Jun 2006 Posts: 33 Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
|
 |
#4 (permalink) Tue Jun 13, 2006 4:53 am Comma could be used before that or that's: why? |
|
|
Sure, Tere, but we use "which" in a nondefining relative clause, and not "that", so you won't usually (maybe ever) find a relative clause with "that" preceded by a comma.
The movie that I saw yesterday was great. (No commas, and you don't even need "that".) The movie, which I saw yesterday, was great. (Commas, and you can't use "that".) |
|
Jamie (K) I'm a Communicator ;-)
Joined: 24 Feb 2006 Posts: 5332 Location: Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
 |
#5 (permalink) Tue Jun 13, 2006 16:03 pm Comma could be used before that or that's: why? |
|
|
[quote="Jamie (K)"]Sure, Tere, but we use "which" in a nondefining relative clause, and not "that", quote]
Ooops...Did I say that...or use it wrongly in my examples? I don?t think so. What I said is quite right. You may claim it??s not complete because I didn?t mention the relative pronouns to be used in each case...but I just focused on the use of commas according to the type.
| Quote: |
so you won't usually (maybe ever) find a relative clause with "that" preceded by a comma.
|
I can?t think of any possible correct idea following that pattern... No way |
|
Tere I'm new here and I like it ;-)

Joined: 08 Jun 2006 Posts: 33 Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
|
 |
|
Yankee I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 16 Apr 2006 Posts: 8265 Location: USA
|
 |
#7 (permalink) Tue Jun 13, 2006 19:47 pm Comma could be used before that or that's: why? |
|
|
Thank you, everybody.
No, I did not want to confuse anybody, ...it is only that I read a sentence in a novel a few days back( By the way I have lost it and furiously looking for it) in which the author wrote a long sentence and it came this way:
" ..., that's why..."
or this way:
" ...; that's why..."
Thanks again Tom |
|
Tom I'm a Communicator ;-)
Joined: 30 May 2006 Posts: 2061
|
 |
|
| Password and Buzzword | 'speak in English' vs. 'speak English' |