|
|
Sun Jun 18, 2006 2:17 am If WOULD could be treated like WILL |
|
|
. In detail: no. Wouldn't does not work like will for future. _________________ Canadian-American native speaker who teaches English for a living at Mister Micawber's ESL cafe: Interview with Mr. Micawber |
|
Mister Micawber Moderator

Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 3673 Location: Yokohama, Japan
|
|
Sun Jun 18, 2006 9:40 am If WOULD could be treated like WILL |
|
|
Hi Tom
He would come back in an hour if he could, but he can't. (My point: The sentence "He would come back in an hour" simply sounds incomplete.)
The same is true for your second example. You started out with "will" and then changed over to "would" without any reason at all and therefore "No, it wouldn't" also sounds incomplete and wrong. You have to stick with "will" (or "won't") for that kind of a short response to a "will" statement.
As Mr. M. said, the uses and meanings of "will" and "would" are different. What led you to believe that they might be so easily interchangeable?
Amy _________________ Amy
.
ESL teacher, translator, and a native speaker of American English |
|
Yankee I'm a Communicator ;-)

Joined: 16 Apr 2006 Posts: 6623 Location: USA
|
 |
Sun Jun 18, 2006 11:48 am Will/would |
|
|
Hi Tom,
In the idea of what is going to happen, will is the definite and would is the indefinite.
In these two examples:
He will come
He would come
will refers to the definite in the sense of he is going to come
would refers to the indefinite because it is conditioned by something else and suggests an if is coming in the next sentence.
Alan _________________ English as a Second Language You can read my ESL story Start or begin? |
|
Alan Co-founder

Joined: 27 Sep 2003 Posts: 6862 Location: UK
|
 |
|
| Meaning of "to be in the doghouse" | "Heard" or "Heard of" |